The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Who Will Teach? Policies That Matter
Open accessAbstract
Part 1 The teaching profession at a turning point: carrots and sticks critical questions incentives an opportunity for change. Part 2 Who prepares to teach?: the shrinking personnel pool the changing demographic profile of new licensees different teaching specialities for different times. Part 3 Who becomes a teacher?: national trends North Carolina trends incentives matter. Part 4 Finding skilled teachers - hiring practices make a difference: hiring new teachers - two case studies problems and solutions. Part 5 How long do teachers stay in teaching?: attrition is high in the first years race makes a difference mature women stay, young women leave elementary school teachers stay the longest, chemistry and physics teachers the shortest teachers with high test scores leave teachers who are paid more stay longer staffing the schools in the 1990s. Part 6 Who returns to teaching?: most career interruptions are short women are more likely to return than men elementary teachers are the most likely to return, chemistry and physics teachers the least likely teachers with higher test scores are less likely to return the reserve pool in the future. Part 7 Revising licensing requirements: the economics of occupational licensing why traditional licensing requirements for teachers are flawed why licensing of teachers is necessary evidence informing the redisign of licensing requirements directions for new licensing requriements trade-offs in the design of performance assessments the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards alternative assessment approaches using performance assessments in teacher licensing - evidence from Connecticut reforming licensing requirements - necessary, but not enough. Part 8 Getting the incentives right: fruitless policies elements of a promising strategy stimulating change critical questions. Appendices: research context - whom did we study? methodology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Teachers, Schools, and Academic Achievement
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00584.x · Cited by 4,501
Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038003499 · Cited by 2,989
“For example, some of the best-known research on teacher attrition used single-city or single-state data (e.g., Grissmer & Kirby, 1992; Murnane, 1981; Murnane et al., 1991; Schlechty & Vance, 1981, 1983).”
BackgroundMethodWhat Are the Effects of Induction and Mentoring on Beginning Teacher Turnover?
Smith, T. M., & Ingersoll, R. M. (2004) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312041003681 · Cited by 1,632
Ingersoll, R. M., & Strong, M. (2011) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654311403323 · Cited by 1,506
Pursuing a “Sense of Success”: New Teachers Explain Their Career Decisions
Johnson, S. M., & Birkeland, S. E. (2003) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312040003581 · Cited by 932
Metadata
- Authors
- Summers, A. A., Murnane, R. J., Singer, J. D., Willet, J. B., Kemple, J. J., & Olsen, R. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 732
- ISSN
- 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1951098532
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 62.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Who Will Teach? Policies That Matter. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3324973
- The paper
- Summers, A. A., Murnane, R. J., Singer, J. D., Willet, J. B., Kemple, J. J., & Olsen, R. J. (1992). Who Will Teach? Policies That Matter. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3324973
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.