The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Designs, Perspectives, and Policy Formation
Abstract
Even though a citizen participation component is included in nearly every major local government planning and policy initiative, most citizen participation techniques have been judged to be less than adequate tools for informing policy makers about the people's will. Recently, having planners or policy analysts work closely with long-standing citizen panels composed of a randomly selected sample of community members has been proposed as one appropriate response to many of the inadequacies of traditional techniques. In this article, staff from a municipal government policy analysis unit describe and critique a yearlong citizen panel project focused on developing a transportation master plan in a university community. They argue that panels can overcome many of the limitations to effective citizen participation. The authors also suggest that panels can work well, but only if policy analysts assume more pro-active and advocacy roles than those routinely found in local government.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Cited by
Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?
Irvin, R. A., & Stansbury, J. (2004) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x · Cited by 1,941
Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society
(2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511490934 · Cited by 1,751
What are the differences between sustainable and smart cities?
Ahvenniemi, H., Huovila, A., Pinto-Seppä, I., & Airaksinen, M. (2017) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2016.09.009 · Cited by 1,378
Making Plans that Matter:Citizen Involvement and Government Action
Burby, R. J. (2003) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944360308976292 · Cited by 631
Public participation in health care priority setting: A scoping review
Mitton, C., Smith, N., Peacock, S., Evoy, B., & Abelson, J. (2009) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.01.005 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Kathlene, L., & Martin, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Policy Analysis and Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46
- ISSN
- 0276-8739 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022128261
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Designs, Perspectives, and Policy Formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3325512
- The paper
- Kathlene, L., & Martin, J. A. (1991). Enhancing Citizen Participation: Panel Designs, Perspectives, and Policy Formation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3325512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.