Cited by 803Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsHealth Sciences Research and EducationDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Clinical Judgment: How Expert Nurses Use Intuition

Benner, Patricia, Tanner, Christine·1987·The American Journal of Nursing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3470396

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Expert knowledge is very specific to the domain in which the expert practices (context- or content-specific).

    “Firstly, the nature of expert knowledge is such that it is very specific to the domain in which the expert practices, that is, it is context-or content-specific (Norman et al 1985, Benner & Tanner 1987, Edwards 1998)”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benner, P., & Tanner, C.
Affiliations
Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Nursing
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-01
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
23
ISSN
0002-936X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966515155
Cited by
803
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 26
FWCI
13.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • AJN American Journal of Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (5NR01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
clinical judgment, intuition, expert nurses, nursing expertise, clinical decision-making
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Competence, Female, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Male, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Perception, Pilot Projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review