Cited by 125Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Subjective measures of spiritual well-being

Moberg, David O.·1984·Review of Religious Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3511368

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moberg, D. O.
Corresponding author
Moberg, David O.
Venue
Review of Religious Research
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1984-06
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
351
ISSN
0034-673X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2325411785
Cited by
125
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Religious Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spiritual well-being, subjective well-being, spiritual health, religious experience, self-assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review