Cited by 95Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

Clarifying the relation between spirituality and well-being

Migdal, Lori, MacDonald, Douglas A.·2013·Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

Koenig (J Nerv Ment Dis 196:349-355, 2008) and others have asserted that measures of spirituality used to investigate its association with health seem to present a misleading picture of the relationship because of evidence suggesting that spirituality has become conceptually confounded with well-being. To evaluate this claim, the present study used a sample of 247 university students to explore the relation of a multidimensional model of spirituality with several different forms of well-being and the association of both with a two-factor model of social desirability. Correlational and regression analyses revealed that, although there is some evidence of an association, it is generally of low effect size and seems to differ as a function of how spirituality is defined. More importantly, however, there was the finding that existential well-being, a concept often incorporated into definitions of spirituality and a part of the measurement model used in this study, is virtually uncorrelated with explicitly spiritual and religious variables but shows a pattern of association with measures of well-being and social desirability, which suggests that it would be better conceptualized as a form of well-being and not spirituality. The article concludes with a discussion of the meaning of the findings for understanding the spirituality-health literature and suggestions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/nmd.0b013e318288e26a

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Migdal, L., & MacDonald, D. A.
Affiliations
University of Detroit Mercy (US)
Venue
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
2013-04
Volume
201
Issue
4
Pages
274-280
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987629439
Cited by
95
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4
FWCI
8.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spirituality, well-being, existential well-being, social desirability, religiosity, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Culture, Defense Mechanisms, Existentialism, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Religion, Self Concept, Social Desirability, Reproducibility of Results, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review