Cited by 133Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsEating Disorders and Behaviors

Firm Believers? Religion, Body Weight, and Well-Being

Ferraro, Kenneth F.·1998·Review of Religious Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3512590

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the nine best cholesterol studies, five (56%) reported lower cholesterol or a lowering of cholesterol in response to an R/S intervention, whereas one found higher cholesterol but only in Mexican American men.

    “Of the nine best studies, five (56%) reported lower cholesterol [311–313] or a lowering of cholesterol in response to a R/S intervention [314, 315], whereas one found higher cholesterol (but only in Mexican American men) [316].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ferraro, K. F.
Corresponding author
Ferraro, Kenneth F.
Venue
Review of Religious Research
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1998-03
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
224
ISSN
0034-673X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2323792253
Cited by
133
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Religious Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
religion, body weight, well-being, religious beliefs, obesity, health outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review