Cited by 226Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Religious attendance and the health behaviors of Texas adults

Hill, Terrence D., Burdette, Amy M., Ellison, Christopher G., Musick, Marc A.·2006·Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study is to test whether religious involvement is associated with a broad range of health behaviors.Method We employ data from the 2004 Survey of Texas Adults, a statewide probability sample of 1504 Texas adults. Using these data, we estimate a series of logistic regression models to assess the net effects of religious attendance on 12 health behaviors.Results Our results show that regular religious attendance (especially weekly attendance) is associated with a wide range of healthy behaviors, including preventive care use, vitamin use, infrequent bar attendance, seatbelt use, walking, strenuous exercise, sound sleep quality, never smoking, and moderate drinking.Conclusion If religious involvement is associated with healthy behaviors, additional studies are needed to account for these associations. Future research might also consider health behaviors other than drinking and smoking as potential mechanisms through which religious involvement might benefit health and prolong life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ypmed.2005.12.005

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 67 studies with quality ratings of seven or higher on R/S and anxiety, 38 (55%) reported inverse relationships and seven (10%) found positive relationships.

    “Of the 67 studies with quality ratings of seven or higher, 38 (55%) reported inverse relationships [173–182] and seven (10%) found positive relationships (greater anxiety among the more R/S) [183–189].”
  • Of the 83 methodologically most rigorous smoking studies, 75 (90%) reported inverse relationships with R/S involvement.

    “Of the 83 methodologically most rigorous studies, 75 (90%) reported inverse relationships with R/S involvement [213, 285–294].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hill, T. D., Burdette, A. M., Ellison, C. G., & Musick, M. A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Hill, Terrence D.
Venue
Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
42
Issue
4
Pages
309-312
ISSN
0091-7435 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1989149313
Cited by
226
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
religious service attendance, religious involvement, health behavior, vitamin use, seat belt use, walking, physical activity, sleep quality, smoking, alcohol consumption
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Health Promotion, Health Surveys, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Motor Activity, Primary Prevention, Probability, Religion and Psychology, Risk-Taking, Sleep, Texas, Health Behavior, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review