The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Studying Interpersonal Interaction
Abstract
This volume presents a comprehensive, critical examination of current research methods used to study human social behavior as it occurs in interpersonal settings such as families, acquaintanceships, friendships, and romantic partnerships. Multidisciplinary in approach, the book's chapters are written by leading figures in communication, social psychology, sociology, and family studies who explore the methodological choices a researcher must make in order to study interpersonal interaction.To permit clear comparison, all chapters in this volume reference the same, common research problem to develop examples, illustrate controversial issues, and describe the potential of the particular method under discussion. Written in an accessible style, chapters openly discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each method, consider underlying philosophy and assumptions, and note limitations as well as advantages. The result is an originally crafted work that offers readers a unique way to learn about, compare, and ultimately judge the many methods presently available to the researcher or student of interpersonal interaction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001 · Cited by 20,772
Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.007 · Cited by 1,092
Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication
Burgoon, J. K. (1993) · Journal of Language and Social Psychology · doi:10.1177/0261927x93121003 · Cited by 1,082
Baym, N. K., Zhang, Y. B., & Lin, M.-C. (2004) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444804041438 · Cited by 471
Validity in quantitative content analysis
Rourke, L., & Anderson, T. (2004) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504769 · Cited by 444
Metadata
- Authors
- Fine, M. A., Montgomery, B., & Duck, S.
- Venue
- Journal of Marriage and the Family
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1992-02
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 247
- ISSN
- 0022-2445 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029960088
- Cited by
- 569
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 40.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Studying Interpersonal Interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/353297
- The paper
- Fine, M. A., Montgomery, B., & Duck, S. (1992). Studying Interpersonal Interaction. Journal of Marriage and the Family. https://doi.org/10.2307/353297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.