The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Key Ecological Function of Charcoal from Wildfire in the Boreal Forest
Abstract
Wildfire is a major disturbance factor in boreal forests where it is important in rejuvenating soil properties and encouraging tree regeneration and growth. However, the mechanisms behind these effects are poorly understood and little is known as to the ecological effects of charcoal produced by wildfire in these ecosystems. In this study we firstly quantified the mass of charcoal in a chronosequence of twelve forest sites in northern Sweden and found charcoal mass in soil to vary from 984 to 2074 kg ha -1 ; these levels appear to be sufficient for charcoal to have important ecological effect through its sorptive abilities. We then investigated the ability of charcoal from 32 forest stands (representing a range of ages from 1 to 350 yr since last fire) to adsorb phenolic compounds produced by the late successional dwarf shrub Empetrum hermaphroditum ; phenolic compounds from this species have previously been shown to have important phytotoxic effects in boreal forests. Charcoal in soil from forests younger than 100 yr was very effective at reducing these effects while older charcoal was not, suggesting that the sorptive ability is likely to be most important in earlier-successional forests. Experimental reheating of deactivated older charcoal from soil showed that temperatures above 450°C could reactivate charcoal. A microcosm experiment also revealed that soil microbes could effectively reactivate young charcoal that had been saturated with phenolics. Finally we investigated the effects of artificially made charcoal on soil microbial properties at six sites. The microbial biomass was consistently enhanced in humus when it was placed adjacent to charcoal particles. Decomposition of plant litter was sometimes also affected by being in the proximity of charcoal but the dircction of these effects was unpredictable. We conclude that charcoal might catalyse important ecological soil processes in early-successional boreal forests, effects that diminish as succession proceeds, and ultimately may have important long-term consequences for stand productivity and ecosystem function, especially in forests under strict fire control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074
Effects of fire on properties of forest soils: a review
Certini, G. (2005) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-004-1788-8 · Cited by 2,944
Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis
Biederman, L. A., & Harpole, W. S. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12037 · Cited by 1,737
Rondon, M. A., Lehmann, J., Ramírez, J., & Hurtado, M. (2007) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-006-0152-z · Cited by 1,333
Review of the stability of biochar in soils: predictability of O:C molar ratios
Spokas, K. A. (2010) · Carbon Management · doi:10.4155/cmt.10.32 · Cited by 1,160
Metadata
- Authors
- Zackrisson, O., Nilsson, M.-C., & Wardle, D. A.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2319032873
- Cited by
- 427
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Key Ecological Function of Charcoal from Wildfire in the Boreal Forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3545580
- The paper
- Zackrisson, O., Nilsson, M.-C., & Wardle, D. A. (1996). Key Ecological Function of Charcoal from Wildfire in the Boreal Forest. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3545580
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.