The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Species Pool and Its Relation to Species Richness: Evidence from Estonian Plant Communities
Abstract
Two types of species pool are distinguished. The regional species pool is defined as the set of species, occurring in a certain region (here: Estonia) which are capable of coexisting in a target community. The actual species pool is defined as the set of species present in a community. Field data from 14 different vegetation types in Estonia were used. The regional pool was compiled by including from the regional flora (1) all species for which the Ellenberg indicator values did not differ more than 1.5 relative units from the community mean and (2) all indifferent species. The actual pool was compiled by careful field observations. The aim of the paper is to test the validity of two null hypotheses about the species pool. HO 1 postulates that any size of the actual species pool is equally probable in the interval between zero and the size of the regional species pool. HO 2 postulates that any value of species richness per unit area (1 m 2 ) is equally probable in the interval between zero and the size of the actual species pool. To test the strengths of the relationships Monte Carlo modelling was used. It was shown that the relation between variables was stronger than proposed by the null models (P = 0.041 for HO 1 and P = 0.002 for HO 2 ). Consequently, the size of the actual species pool is largely determined by the regional species pool, and the species richness per 1 m 2 is largely determined by the actual pool. The results are discussed in the framework of coexistence theory. The size of the regional pool is determined by evolutionary (speciation) and historical (large-scale migration) processes. The size of the actual pool depends on local-scale migration, which can be a function of isolation, successional stage, local management history, etc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Taylor, D. R., Aarssen, L. W., & Loehle, C. (1990) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3545432 · Cited by 470
Cited by
Huston, M. A. (1999) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546645 · Cited by 747
Patterns of plant species richness in relation to different environments: An appraisal
Pausas, J. G., & Austin, M. P. (2001) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3236601 · Cited by 558
Dark diversity: shedding light on absent species
Pärtel, M., Szava-Kovats, R., & Zobel, M. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2010.12.004 · Cited by 386
Self-citationSpecies pool: the concept, its determination and significance for community restoration
Zobel, M., van der Maarel, E., & Dupré, C. (1998) · Applied Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/1479085 · Cited by 357
Self-citationLOCAL PLANT DIVERSITY PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY AT THE REGIONAL SCALE
Pärtel, M. (2002) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2361:lpdpae]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 316
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pärtel, M., Zobel, M., Zobel, K., van der Maarel, E., & Partel, M.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 111
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2093405265
- Cited by
- 488
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Species Pool and Its Relation to Species Richness: Evidence from Estonian Plant Communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3546327
- The paper
- Pärtel, M., Zobel, M., Zobel, K., van der Maarel, E., & Partel, M. (1996). The Species Pool and Its Relation to Species Richness: Evidence from Estonian Plant Communities. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546327
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.