The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Adaptive Patterns of Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects
Abstract
Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects is largely determined by adult insects choosing the developmental location of offspring. Knowledge of natural selection leads to theoretical predictions about how adult behaviour might respond to host quality, the abundance of host-plants, adult egg-load, age and available search time, density-dependence, and stochastic effects. Debates about the value of simple adaptive models can only be settled by repeated testing and reformulation. The theoretical basis of adaptive host-selection is quite strong, but several challenges remain. Models are lacking which are both general enough to be applicable to a wide range of species, and easy to test. The role of variability in plant abundance and other stochastic forces requires clarification. Empirically, good field studies of the effect of host-plants on insect fitness are rare, but without them little progress can be made. The assessment of host-preference also requires attention. Quantitative tests of theory are rare, probably because general models do not encompass enough relevant natural history for each particular species. However much anecdotal and qualitative evidence seems to reflect adaptive predictions. A challenge for the future is to assess the adaptive value of particular mechanisms of host-selection, and to relate these to the predictions made in simple adaptive models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On aims and methods of ethology
Tinbergen, N. (1963) · Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.1963.tb01161.x · Cited by 4,551
BUTTERFLIES AND PLANTS: A STUDY IN COEVOLUTION
Ehrlich, P. R., & Raven, P. H. (1964) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1964.tb01674.x · Cited by 4,495
Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2)
LEVINS, R. (2020) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbbh · Cited by 3,383
Fretwell, S. D., & Lucas, H. L. (1969) · Acta Biotheoretica · doi:10.1007/bf01601953 · Cited by 3,138
Plant Apparency and Chemical Defense
Feeny, P. (1976) · Biochemical Interaction Between Plants and Insects · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-2646-5_1 · Cited by 2,344
Populations in a Seasonal Environment.
Cody, M. L., & Fretwell, S. D. (1973) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406975 · Cited by 1,681
Optimality theory in evolutionary biology
Parker, G. A., & Smith, J. M. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/348027a0 · Cited by 972
Dynamic Modeling in Behavioral Ecology.
Caraco, T., Newman, J. A., Mangel, M., & Clark, C. W. (1990) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2409517 · Cited by 761
How to Carry Out the Adaptationist Program?
Mayr, E. (1983) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284064 · Cited by 684
Via, S. (1990) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.002225 · Cited by 371
Cited by
Bowler, D. E., & Benton, T. G. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793104006645 · Cited by 1,904
A meta‐analysis of preference–performance relationships in phytophagous insects
Gripenberg, S., Mayhew, P. J., Parnell, M., & Roslin, T. (2010) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01433.x · Cited by 892
Self-citationRavigné, V., Dieckmann, U., & Olivieri, I. (2009) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/605369 · Cited by 268
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayhew, P. J.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 417
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2086744406
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive Patterns of Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3546884
- The paper
- Mayhew, P. J. (1997). Adaptive Patterns of Host-Plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546884
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.