Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 247

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Grazing and the Dynamics of Nutrient and Energy Regulated Microbial Processes in the Serengeti grasslands

Ruess, R. W., McNaughton, S. J.·1987·Oikos

Abstract

Microbial biomasses and N and P mineralization potentials were determined on soils collected from short-, mid- and tallgrass communities along a gradient of increasing rainfall and decreasing grazing intensity in the Serengeti National Park, Tanzania. Total N, organic C, pH and clay content were highest on shortgrass sites which experienced the highest grazing intensities, and declined successively on soils from mid- and tallgrass communities. Microbial biomass ranged across sites from an average of 47.1 ± 6.3 to 315.8 ± 8.4 mg C 100 g dry soil-1, and was directly related to grazing intensity and organic carbon, and inversely related to soil C/N ratio. Net N mineralized over the 20 d incubation period ranged from 1.0 +± 1.3 to 63.4 ± 4.6 ig N g dry soil-' 20 d-1, was a function of both total N and soil microbial biomass, and varied inversely with soil C/N ratio. Periods of net N immobilization lowered the mean mineralization rates in soils from midgrass sites. Net N mineralized ranged from 0.09 ± 0.10% of total soil N at Seronera, the site with the lowest grazing intensity, to 2.24 + 0.17% of total soil N at Southeast Kopjes, a site with high grazing intensity. In order to study microbial growth and the concomitant N and P mineralization responses to varying substrate quality, soil samples were subjected to a laboratory experiment involving untreated soils, and three C amendment treatments which included either glucose, wildebeest dung or plant litter. Dung-amended soils showed higher net N mineralization levels in comparison to litter-amended soils, despite insignificant differences in total respiration. The more efficient utilization of dung compared with plant litter, appeared to be related to more balanced C/nutrient ratios of dung and the energy or nutrient limited site-specific characteristics of microbial growth. On sites of low nutrient availability, the increased flow of P through dung may be important in maintaining accelerated nutrient cycling rates in the grazing food web.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3565559

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 247

Metadata

Authors
Ruess, R. W., & McNaughton, S. J.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-05
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
101
ISSN
0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2315526428
Cited by
247
References
4
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Grazing and the Dynamics of Nutrient and Energy Regulated Microbial Processes in the Serengeti grasslands. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3565559
The paper
Ruess, R. W., & McNaughton, S. J. (1987). Grazing and the Dynamics of Nutrient and Energy Regulated Microbial Processes in the Serengeti grasslands. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.2307/3565559

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.