Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 394

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Radiation Dose and Second Cancer Risk in Patients Treated for Cancer of the Cervix

Boice, John D., Engholm, Göran, Kleinerman, Ruth A., Blettner, Maria, Stovall, Marilyn, Lisco, Hermann, Moloney, William C., Austin, Donald F., Bosch, Antonio, Cookfair, Diane L., Krementz, Edward T., Latourette, Howard B., Merrill, James A., Peters, Lester J., Schulz, Milford D., Storm, Hans H., Björkholm, Elisabeth, Pettersson, Folke, Bell, C. M. Janine, Coleman, Michel P., Fraser, Patricia, Neal, Frank E., Prior, Patricia, Choi, N. Won, Hislop, T. Gregory, Koch, Maria, Kreiger, Nancy, Robb, Dorothy, Robson, Diane, Thomson, D. H., Lochmüller, H., von Fournier, Dietrich, Frischkorn, Rolf, Kjørstad, Kjell E., Rimpela, Arja, Pejovic, Marie-Hélène, Kirn, Vera Pompe, Stankusova, Hanna, Berrino, Franco, Sigurdsson, Kristjan, Hutchison, George B., MacMahon, Brian, Engholm, Goran, Bjorkholm, Elisabeth, Lochmuller, H., Kjorstad, Kjell E., Pejovic, Marie-Helene·1988·Radiation Research

Abstract

The risk of cancer associated with a broad range of organ doses was estimated in an international study of women with cervical cancer. Among 150,000 patients reported to one of 19 population-based cancer registries or treated in any of 20 oncology clinics, 4188 women with second cancers and 6880 matched controls were selected for detailed study. Radiation doses for selected organs were reconstructed for each patient on the basis of her original radiotherapy records. Very high doses, on the order of several hundred gray, were found to increase the risk of cancers of the bladder [relative risk (RR) = 4.0], rectum (RR = 1.8), vagina (RR = 2.7), and possibly bone (RR = 1.3), uterine corpus (RR = 1.3), cecum (RR = 1.5), and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (RR = 2.5). For all female genital cancers taken together, a sharp dose-response gradient was observed, reaching fivefold for doses more than 150 Gy. Several gray increased the risk of stomach cancer (RR = 2.1) and leukemia (RR = 2.0). Although cancer of the pancreas was elevated, there was no evidence of a dose-dependent risk. Cancer of the kidney was significantly increased among 15-year survivors. A nonsignificant twofold risk of radiogenic thyroid cancer was observed following an average dose of only 0.11 Gy. Breast cancer was not increased overall, despite an average dose of 0.31 Gy and 953 cases available for evaluation (RR = 0.9); there was, however, a weak suggestion of a dose response among women whose ovaries had been surgically removed. Doses greater than 6 Gy to the ovaries reduced breast cancer risk by 44%. A significant deficit of ovarian cancer was observed within 5 years of radiotherapy; in contrast, a dose response was suggested among 10-year survivors. Radiation was not found to increase the overall risk of cancers of the small intestine, colon, ovary, vulva, connective tissue, breast, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, or chronic lymphocytic leukemia. For most cancers associated with radiation, risks were highest among long-term survivors and appeared concentrated among women irradiated at relatively younger ages.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3577477

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 394

Metadata

Authors
Boice, J. D., Engholm, G., Kleinerman, R. A., Blettner, M., Stovall, M., Lisco, H., Moloney, W. C., Austin, D. F., Bosch, A., Cookfair, D. L., Krementz, E. T., Latourette, H. B., Merrill, J. A., Peters, L. J., Schulz, M. D., Storm, H. H., Björkholm, E., Pettersson, F., Bell, C. M. J., Coleman, M. P., Fraser, P., Neal, F. E., Prior, P., Choi, N. W., Hislop, T. G., Koch, M., Kreiger, N., Robb, D., Robson, D., Thomson, D. H., Lochmüller, H., von Fournier, D., Frischkorn, R., Kjørstad, K. E., Rimpela, A., Pejovic, M.-H., Kirn, V. P., Stankusova, H., Berrino, F., Sigurdsson, K., Hutchison, G. B., MacMahon, B., Engholm, G., Bjorkholm, E., Lochmuller, H., Kjorstad, K. E., & Pejovic, M.-H.
Venue
Radiation Research
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1988-10
Volume
116
Issue
1
Pages
3
ISSN
0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971713603
Cited by
394
References
0
FWCI
9.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Radiation Dose and Second Cancer Risk in Patients Treated for Cancer of the Cervix. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3577477
The paper
Boice, J. D., Engholm, G., Kleinerman, R. A., Blettner, M., Stovall, M., Lisco, H., Moloney, W. C., Austin, D. F., Bosch, A., Cookfair, D. L., Krementz, E. T., Latourette, H. B., Merrill, J. A., Peters, L. J., Schulz, M. D., Storm, H. H., Björkholm, E., Pettersson, F., Bell, C. M. J., . . . Pejovic, M.-H. (1988). Radiation Dose and Second Cancer Risk in Patients Treated for Cancer of the Cervix. Radiation Research. https://doi.org/10.2307/3577477

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.