Cited by 634EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Learning and TeachingMultilingual Education and Policy

Age and Rate of Acquisition of Second Language for Academic Purposes

Collier, Virginia P.·1987·TESOL Quarterly

Abstract

The study reported in this article analyzed the length of time required for 1,548 advantaged limited English proficient (LEP) students to become proficient in English for academic purposes while receiving instruction in English in all subject areas. Variables included were age on arrival, English proficiency level upon arrival, basic literacy and math skills in the native language upon arrival, and number of years of schooling in English. Second language and content-area achievement were measured by students' performance on the Science Research Associates tests in reading, language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies. The results indicated that LEP students who entered the ESL program at ages 8–11 were the fastest achievers, requiring 2–5 years to reach the 50th percentile on national norms in all the subject areas tested. LEP students who entered the program at ages 5–7 were 1–3 years behind the performance level of their LEP peers who entered the program at ages 8–11, when both groups had the same length of residence. Arrivals at ages 12–15 experienced the greatest difficulty and were projected to require as much as 6–8 years to reach grade-level norms in academic achievement when schooled all in the second language. Whereas some groups may reach proficiency in some subjects in as little as 2 years, it is projected that at least 4–8 years may be required for all ages of LEP students to reach national grade-level norms of native speakers in all subject areas of language and academic achievement, as measured on standardized tests.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3586986

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Second language learners usually require at least 5 years, and sometimes much longer, to catch up to native English speakers in academic English.

    “However, research studies conducted in several countries have reported that second language learners usually require at least 5 years (and sometimes much longer) to catch up to native English speakers in academic English (Collier, 1987;Cummins, 1981;Hakuta, Butler, & Witt, 2000).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collier, V. P.
Affiliations
George Mason University (US)
Corresponding author
Collier, Virginia P.
Venue
TESOL Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1987-12
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
617
ISSN
0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2025660010
Cited by
634
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 39
FWCI
59.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
TESOL Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Multilingual Education and Policy
Keywords
limited English proficient students, English for academic purposes, age at arrival, second language acquisition, academic performance, standardized test performance, immigrant students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review