The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Protean Communication: The Language of Computer-Mediated Communication
Abstract
Computer-mediated communication (CMC), which began in proprietary companies two decades ago, has developed into a worldwide medium of communication that ESOL learners encounter inside and outside the classroom. Because learners' participation in CMC is likely to increase in the coming years, it is important for TESOL professionals to understand the norms of language use developed by CMC-based speech communities. Research has found that CMC exhibits features of simplified registers associated with both oral and written language. It also exhibits its own norms for organizing conversation and accommodating threads of discourse. CMC, however, cannot be studied as a neutral linguistic phenomenon; instead, researchers and educators need to examine how CMC influences the dominance of English, access to knowledge and power, and equity in discourse. Distance learning, an application of CMC that has begun and will continue to serve a role in English language teaching and in ESOL teacher education, is an area in which these issues are relevant. CMC should be viewed not in terms of its functionality but in terms of the ways in which users shape a new medium of communication to fit the needs of their speech community.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“participants of this study were students from Japan, Mexico and Russia who have received less attention in the research on international telecollaboration (Carney, 2005;Murray, 2000).”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Murray, 2000
In the citing paper
“Whereas previous studies mainly focused on students from the USA and Western Europe”
From An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration (2007) · cites this paper as Murray, 2000
Citations
Cites
Interactive Written Discourse as an Emergent Register
FERRARA, K., BRUNNER, H., & WHITTEMORE, G. (1991) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088391008001002 · Cited by 496 · cited 2×
“, Davis & Brewer, 1997; Ferrara et al., 1991; D. E. Murray, 1991) have not found evidence of these emotional outbursts, attributing the different findings to differences in the speech communities studied. However, Herring, who has conducted a variety of studies on gender and CMC, including linguistic analyses (1996c)…”
Background
Cited by
An activity theory perspective on student-reported contradictions in international telecollaboration
Basharina, O. K. (2007) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44105 · Cited by 139
“Whereas previous studies mainly focused on students from the USA and Western Europe, participants of this study were students from Japan, Mexico and Russia who have received less attention in the research on international telecollaboration (Carney, 2005; Murray, 2000).”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, D. E.
- Affiliations
- Macquarie University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Murray, Denise E.
- ORCID
- Murray, Denise E.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 397
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2048990840
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 7.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- TESOL Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Digital Communication and Language
- Social Sciences › Education › English Language Learning and Teaching
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
- Keywords
- computer-mediated communication, speech communities, language norms, discourse structure, distance education, English language teaching, TESOL
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protean Communication: The Language of Computer-Mediated Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3587737
- The paper
- Murray, D. E. (2000). Protean Communication: The Language of Computer-Mediated Communication. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587737
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.