The DOI matches its Crossref record.
English and the Discourses of Colonialism
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Commodification of Language
Heller, M. (2010) · Annual Review of Anthropology · doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.012809.104951 · Cited by 988
Transidiomatic practices: Language and power in the age of globalization
Jacquemet, M. (2005) · Language & Communication · doi:10.1016/j.langcom.2005.05.001 · Cited by 551
The Decolonial Option in English Teaching: Can the Subaltern Act?
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2016) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.202 · Cited by 494
Plagiarism, cultural diversity and metaphor—Implications for academic staff development
Leask, B. (2006) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930500262486 · Cited by 175
Globalization and native English speakers in English Programme in Korea (EPIK)
Jeon, M. (2009) · Language, Culture and Curriculum · doi:10.1080/07908310903388933 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Kubota, R., & Pennycook, A.
- Venue
- TESOL Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 771
- ISSN
- 0039-8322 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4300828079
- Cited by
- 531
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 29.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: English and the Discourses of Colonialism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3587893
- The paper
- Kubota, R., & Pennycook, A. (1999). English and the Discourses of Colonialism. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587893
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
