The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Technique for Analysis of Utilization-Availability Data
Abstract
A statistical technique evaluating preference or avoidance of a given habitat or forage spe- cies is presented, using moose (Alces alces) distribution patterns in an area including the Little Sioux Burn of northeastern Minnesota as an example. The technique is used in conjunction with a chi-square analysis, after the chi-square has led to the rejection of the null hypothesis that a set of observations follows an expected occurrence pattern. The technique involves the use of a Bonferroni z statistic which may be used in estimating whether a specific observation occurs more or less frequently than expected. The technique provides a refinement of quantitative methods which heretofore have not been used to test a multinomial distribution applicable to the example. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 38(3):541-545 The necessity of determining preference or avoidance of a given habitat or plant species in terms of its availability has long been recognized (Glading et al. 1940, Bell- rose and Anderson 1943). A useful means of determining the statistical validity of utilization-availability data is a chi-square test of the hypothesis that animals use habi- tat or forage species in proportion to their availability to the animal, a multinomial distribution (Ostle 1963:124). A problem in using this test arises when the null hy- pothesis is rejected and a significant dif-
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Simultaneous Statistical Inference
Miller, R. G. (1981) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-8122-8 · Cited by 5,604
Introduction to Statistical Analysis.
Latshaw, V. V., Dixon, W. J., & Massey, F. J. (1957) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2309989 · Cited by 5,072
Ostle, B. (1969) · Cited by 1,089
Statistics; probability, inference, and decision
Hays, W. L., & Winkler, R. L. (1975) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 544
Roscoe, J. T., & Byars, J. A. (1971) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1971.10482341 · Cited by 233
Radiotelemetry Studies of Moose in Northeastern Minnesota
Ballenberghe, V. V., & Peek, J. M. (1971) · Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3799872 · Cited by 46
Self-citation
Cited by
Compositional Analysis of Habitat Use From Animal Radio‐Tracking Data
Aebischer, N. J., Robertson, P. A., & Kenward, R. E. (1993) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1940062 · Cited by 1,909
Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologists
Fortin, M.-J., & Dale, M. R. T. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511542039 · Cited by 991
Comparison of Some Statistical Techniques for Analysis of Resource Selection
Alldredge, J. R., & Ratti, J. T. (1986) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3801507 · Cited by 398
Assessing Habitat Selection when Availability Changes
Arthur, S. M., Manly, B. F. J., McDonald, L. L., & Garner, G. W. (1996) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/2265671 · Cited by 360
Autocorrelation of Location Estimates and the Analysis of Radiotracking Data
Otis, D. L., & White, G. C. (1999) · The Journal of Wildlife Management · doi:10.2307/3802819 · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Neu, C. W., Byers, C. R., & Peek, J. M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1974-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 541
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021735364
- Cited by
- 1,537
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 0.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Technique for Analysis of Utilization-Availability Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3800887
- The paper
- Neu, C. W., Byers, C. R., & Peek, J. M. (1974). A Technique for Analysis of Utilization-Availability Data. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3800887
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.