The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accuracy of GPS Telemetry Collar Locations with Differential Correction
Abstract
Global Positioning System (GPS) units in telemetry collars provide an unbiased and precise estimate of animal locations. Under ideal conditions at least 50% of locations are expected to be within 40 m in uncorrected mode GPS, and within 5 m in differential mode GPS. When the collar was placed under open sky, most locations were 3-dimensional locations that could be differentially corrected. Under hardwood canopies with leaves on, the frequency of 3-dimensional locations decreased, the frequencies of failed location attempts and 2-dimensional locations increased, and the precision of GPS locations decreased. We compared the precision of each GPS mode by calculating uncorrected mode and differential mode locations from the same pseudo-range and ephemeris data. We varied the number of satellites used in the location solution to simulate the effect of decreased satellite acquisition due to canopy cover on precision of locations. Precision of locations increased if signals from >4 satellites were used to calculate the location in uncorrected mode and in differential mode. We found that 2-dimensional locations were almost as precise as 3-dimensional positions if the altitude of the GPS unit was known. If the altitude used to calculate a 2-dimensional location was within 50 m of the actual collar altitude, the precision of 2-dimensional differential mode locations was better than 3-dimensional uncorrected mode locations. If the error in altitude was 100 or 150 m, then 50% of 2-dimensional differential mode locations were within 70 m and 95% were within 185 m of the true location. We used GPS locations from collars placed in different cover types and on free-ranging moose (Alces alces) to determine the effect of season, time of day, rainfall, and cover type on GPS performance. On free-ranging moose the collar GPS unit found ≥4 satellites on 52% of location attempts, >50% of locations were 3-dimensional, and >24% of locations were 2-dimensional. Precise tracking of individual animals in all weather throughout the year is possible with GPS telemetry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global positioning system and associated technologies in animal behaviour and ecological research
Tomkiewicz, S. M., Fuller, M. R., Kie, J. G., & Bates, K. K. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0090 · Cited by 528
D'EON, R. G., & DELPARTE, D. (2005) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01010.x · Cited by 364
Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error
LEWIS, J. S., RACHLOW, J. L., GARTON, E. O., & VIERLING, L. A. (2007) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01286.x · Cited by 349
Metadata
- Authors
- Moen, R., Pastor, J., & Cohen, Y.
- Venue
- The Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 530
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985494107
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Accuracy of GPS Telemetry Collar Locations with Differential Correction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/3802612
- The paper
- Moen, R., Pastor, J., & Cohen, Y. (1997). Accuracy of GPS Telemetry Collar Locations with Differential Correction. The Journal of Wildlife Management. https://doi.org/10.2307/3802612
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.