Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 349

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error

Open access
LEWIS, JESSE S., RACHLOW, JANET L., GARTON, EDWARD O., VIERLING, LEE A.·2007·Journal of Applied Ecology

Abstract

Summary: Global positioning system (GPS) technology enables researchers to evaluate wildlife movements, space use and resource selection in detail for extended periods of time. Two types of errors, missed location fixes and location error, are inherent to GPS telemetry and can bias location data sets. Habitat characteristics can influence both types of errors, but no studies have reported how continuous ranges of canopy cover and terrain simultaneously affect location error at different positional dilution of precision (PDOP) and signal quality levels. This information can assist in developing a protocol for removing large location errors from GPS data sets. The objectives of this study were to quantify how canopy cover and terrain affected GPS collar performance within a mountainous region of northern Idaho, USA, and evaluate different data‐screening options for GPS location data sets from stationary test collars and free‐ranging black bears Ursus americanus. The fix rate for test collars was very high in all habitats (mean 99·5%, SE 0·14, range 97·9–100%) and was not related to canopy cover or terrain obstruction. However, habitat variables strongly influenced location error, PDOP values and proportion of three‐dimensional (3‐D) fixes. The 95% circular error probable (CEP) equalled 106·8 m for locations at all test sites, and varied substantially with canopy cover, terrain obstruction and signal quality categories, ranging from 14·3 m to 557·0 m. Location errors for two‐dimensional (2‐D) fixes were more variable at higher PDOP values and were significantly larger compared with 3‐D fixes. Data screening increased the accuracy of test collar location data sets by removing large location errors that were associated with high PDOP values. Data‐screening options that focused on screening 2‐D locations were most effective in reducing location error and retaining the greatest number of locations. For black bear data sets, the four data screening options resulted in data reduction ranging from 8% to 35%. Synthesis and applications. We have demonstrated how location data can be analysed and screened based on 2‐D and 3‐D fixes in relation to PDOP values to eliminate locations with potentially large location errors. This information can be applied to GPS location data for individual animals to increase data accuracy for analyses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01286.x

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 349

Metadata

Authors
LEWIS, J. S., RACHLOW, J. L., GARTON, E. O., & VIERLING, L. A.
Venue
Journal of Applied Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-08
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
663-671
ISSN
  • 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2664
OpenAlex
W1809804898
Cited by
349
References
16
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01286.x
The paper
LEWIS, J. S., RACHLOW, J. L., GARTON, E. O., & VIERLING, L. A. (2007). Effects of habitat on GPS collar performance: using data screening to reduce location error. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01286.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.