CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 53Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesAmerican Environmental and Regional HistoryEcology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Ecology and Conservation in the Cultural Landscape of New England: Lessons from Nature's History

Foster, David R., Motzkin, Glenn·1998·Northeastern Naturalist
DOI 10.2307/3858582
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As a result of historical and current human impacts on natural ecosystems worldwide, most modern landscapes involve an element of cultural influence. In New England, for example, although the landscape was largely forested prior to European settlement, it was highly dynamic in response to changing climatic conditions, natural disturbance processes, and American Indian activities. European settlement in the 17th and 18th centuries initiated a dramatic transformation, as much of the land was deforested and farmed and the remainder was logged, grazed or burned. Since the mid 19th century, agriculture and forest use have declined, forest area and age have increased, and the land has become more natural than at any time in the preceeding centuries. However, despite the natural appearance of many portions of the modern landscape, a legacy of intensive past use remains in vegetation structure and composition, landscape patterns, and ongoing dynamics. Consequently, an understanding of the history of human influence should be an integral part of ecological study and a critical component of conservation planning and resource management. A major lesson that emerges from historical perspectives is the recognition that there are no static baseline conditions that can be used for experimental control or decision-making. Rather, change is an inherent characteristic of all landscapes and future change is inevitable. Although ecological research can provide insights into the historical and environmental factors that underlie current conditions and that may determine future changes, it does not provide unequivocal guidelines for policy decisions, for these are inherently subjective in nature. The current changes in wildlife populations across the eastern United States, notably an increase in forest interior species and a decline in open-habitat species, underscores the dynamics as well as the policy dilemmas inherent in landscapes that have been strongly modified by human activities. Recent increases in species such as moose, beaver, and bear and a corresponding decline in open-habitat species such as meadowlarks and grasshopper sparrows may be largely understood as a consequence of historical changes in land cover. These dramatic changes pose ethical dilemmas as some native species threaten human property or health, while considerable effort and management may be required to maintain the flora and fauna as well as the conservation and aesthetic values associated with cultural landscapes. Historical perspectives increase our understanding of the dynamic nature of the landscape, the long-term influence of humans as components of functioning ecosystems, and the cultural basis for our conservation decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3858582

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Foster, D. R., & Motzkin, G.
Venue
Northeastern Naturalist
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1998
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
111
ISSN
1092-6194 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.2307/3858582
OpenAlex
W2329522113
Semantic Scholar
024f24d2ef507eeb0a28cbed69735e358f4ebce1
Cited by
53
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Northeastern Naturalist (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › American Environmental and Regional History
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Keywords
cultural landscape, New England, historical landscape change, anthropogenic impacts, forest history, European settlement, deforestation, land use legacy, conservation planning, baseline conditions, moose, beavers, land cover change, conservation ethics, resource management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review