Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Richness, Abundance and Biomass of the Arthropod Communities on Trees

Southwood, T. R. E., Moran, V. C., Kennedy, C. E. J.·1982·The Journal of Animal Ecology

Abstract

(1) The invertebrate fauna of six tree species in both Britain and South Africa was sampled using pyrethrum knockdown. Two of the tree species in Britain and three in South Africa were introduced; the rest were native. (2) Average faunal diversities were similar in South Africa and in Britain. (3) The South African arthropod community consisted of fewer, heavier individuals than the British ones and tended to have a more uniform, larger biomass overall. (4) Faunal diversity was similar for native and introduced trees for all guilds except the phytophages, which showed a lower diversity on introduced trees. (5) On every native tree, the most abundant species was an hemipteran; on four of the five introduced trees other orders provided the most abundant species. (6) Total species richness was correlated with tree abundance for both native and introduced trees in Britain. (7) Arthropod abundance increased with species richness-as communities became richer in species, they became more tightly packed. (8) The biomass and numbers of individual arthropods, classified by guild, was not clearly related to structural and other features of the individual trees sampled. (9) There was a positive correlation between the biomass of chewing phytophages and a measure of defoliation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3988

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Southwood, T. R. E., Moran, V. C., & Kennedy, C. E. J.
Venue
The Journal of Animal Ecology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1982-06
Volume
51
Issue
2
Pages
635
ISSN
0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2249384781
Cited by
191
References
2
FWCI
8.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.