The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Technological Leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. Video Game Console Industry
Abstract
In industries characterized by network externalities, the self-reinforcing effects of installed base and the availability of complementary goods can lead to a single (or few) firm(s) controlling nearly all of the market share in a product category. A new entrant may attempt to displace the incumbent standard by introducing a radically improved technology, leapfrogging the current generation. However, a technological advantage alone is often not enough. To lure customers away from the existing standard, the new technology must somehow yield more value than the combination of value yielded by the incumbent technology's functionality, installed base, and complementary goods. This article develops a multidimensional framework of technology value components, which is then applied to data from case studies of three generations of competition in the U.S. video game industry. The article presents both strategies a potential entrant can use to successfully leapfrog an incumbent and strategies an incumbent can use to defend its position.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (. (2010) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.74.2.133 · Cited by 2,363
Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps
McIntyre, D. P., & Srinivasan, A. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2596 · Cited by 1,109
Platform competition: Strategic trade‐offs in platform markets
Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2066 · Cited by 780
Entry into platform‐based markets
Zhu, F., & Iansiti, M. (2012) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.941 · Cited by 629
Competing in Digital Markets: A Platform-Based Perspective
Cennamo, C. (2021) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0048 · Cited by 487
Metadata
- Authors
- Schilling, M. A.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 6-32
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W1984258431
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technological Leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. Video Game Console Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/41166174
- The paper
- Schilling, M. A. (2003). Technological Leapfrogging: Lessons from the U.S. Video Game Console Industry. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.