The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Strategic Management of Product Recovery
Abstract
A growing concern for durable product manufacturers is how to manage the products they manufacture when they reach their end of life (EOL). In part, this attention is motivated by a growing number of countries across Europe and East Asia that are enacting legislation that imposes greater responsibilities on manufacturers for managing their EOL products. Even in non-regulated markets, however, some manufacturers are engaging in product recovery to reduce production costs, enhance brand image, meet changing customer expectations, protect aftermarkets, and preempt pending legislation or regulations. This article explains when manufacturers should engage in product recovery efforts through partnerships, alliances, or vertical integration and when they should leave this task to independent firms. Technologies that enhance the productivity of product recovery, the level of uncertainty associated with reverse logistics, diverse manufacturing-related capabilities, the uniqueness of recovered assets, and the desire to avoid dependence on other organizations are key determinants that shape the industrial organization of EOL product recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939 · cited 1×
“Firms create organizing principles such as coding schemes, values, and common languages that enable them to outperform markets at sharing and transferring the information and know-how possessed by individuals and groups within their organization.(71) As such, firms internalize activities when tacit knowledge or relate…”
BackgroundThe resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation
Grant, R. M. (1991) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41166664 · Cited by 9,699
The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance
Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260996 · Cited by 3,653
A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.5.477 · Cited by 3,146
On Coase, Competence, and the Corporation
(1988) · The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036942 · Cited by 422
Cited by
Circular supply chain management: a definition and structured literature review
Farooque, M., Zhang, A., Thürer, M., Qu, T., & Huisingh, D. (2019) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.303 · Cited by 894
Green supply chain management implications for “closing the loop”
Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-H. (2008) · Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review · doi:10.1016/j.tre.2006.06.003 · Cited by 665
Product life-cycle implications for remanufacturing strategies
Östlin, J., Sundin, E., & Björkman, M. (2009) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.02.021 · Cited by 329
A critical assessment of motives for product recovery: the case of engine remanufacturing
Seitz, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.029 · Cited by 320
Creative Destruction and Destructive Creations: Environmental Ethics and Planned Obsolescence
Guiltinan, J. (2009) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9907-9 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Toffel, M. W.
- Venue
- California Management Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 120-141
- ISSN
- 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
- 2162-8564
- OpenAlex
- W1975235566
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 31.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategic Management of Product Recovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/41166214
- The paper
- Toffel, M. W. (2004). Strategic Management of Product Recovery. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166214
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.