Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 225

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Collaborating with Activists: How Starbucks Works with NGOs

Argenti, Paul A.·2004·California Management Review

Abstract

This article analyzes the company's ultimate decision to sell Fair Trade coffee and subsequently work with other NGOs to ensure that small farmers receive a living wage, in an effort to live up to the standards Starbucks set for itself in the area of social responsibility. This article provides a brief overview of the changing environment for corporations and NGOs. It discusses the battle between Global Exchange and Starbucks over Fair Trade, including factors that led to the confrontation between Global Exchange and Starbucks, Starbucks' alternatives in the face of Global Exchange's threat, Starbucks' decision, and ensuing events. This artcle also presents collaboration as a growing and important alternative to confrontation in business-NGO relations and offers seven lessons managers can take away from Starbucks' experience.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/41166288

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 225

Metadata

Authors
Argenti, P. A.
Venue
California Management Review
Published
2004-10
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
91-116
ISSN
  • 0008-1256 (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-8564
OpenAlex
W2064524371
Cited by
225
References
0
FWCI
23.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collaborating with Activists: How Starbucks Works with NGOs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/41166288
The paper
Argenti, P. A. (2004). Collaborating with Activists: How Starbucks Works with NGOs. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166288

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.