The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oral and Literate Strategies in Spoken and Written Narratives
Abstract
Comparative analysis of spoken and written versions of a narrative demonstrates (1) that features which have been identified as characterizing oral discourse are also found in written discourse, and (2) that the written short story combines syntactic complexity expected in writing with features which create involvement expected in speaking. Quintessentially literary devices (repetition of sounds and words, syntactic structures, and rhythm) are shared by written literary language and ordinary spontaneous conversation because both are typified by subjective knowing and by focus on interpersonal involvement. In contrast, expository prose and content-focused oral genres, such as lectures and instructions, may be typified by objective knowing and by focus on content.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lakoff, R. (1973) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500000051 · Cited by 3,138
Planned and Unplanned Discourse
Ochs, E. (1979) · Discourse and Syntax · doi:10.1163/9789004368897_004 · Cited by 561
Cited by
Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix
McNamara, D. S., Graesser, A. C., McCarthy, P. M., & Cai, Z. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511894664 · Cited by 892
Spoken and Written Textual Dimensions in English: Resolving the Contradictory Findings
Biber, D. (1986) · Language · doi:10.2307/414678 · Cited by 553
Planning and Interlanguage Variation
Crookes, G. (1989) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263100008391 · Cited by 431
Language users as creatures of habit: A corpus-based analysis of persistence in spoken English
Szmrecsanyi, B. (2005) · Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1515/cllt.2005.1.1.113 · Cited by 286
On the complexity of discourse complexity: A multidimensional analysis
Biber, D. (1992) · Discourse Processes · doi:10.1080/01638539209544806 · Cited by 262
Metadata
- Authors
- Tannen, D.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1982-03
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068561765
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 111.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.