The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Morphological Classes as Natural Categories
Abstract
The most productive class of strong verbs in English is that exemplified by the verb string/strung. Both historical and experimental evidence show that the class is phonologically defined. However, the members do not share a single set of phonological features. Rather, the class is organized around a prototypical member (in the sense of Rosch 1978), to which the other members stand in a family-resemblance relation (in the sense of Wittgenstein 1953). The defining attributes of the class include the final consonants as well as the initial consonants and consonant clusters, and to a lesser extent the vowel of the base verb. The organization of the formal aspects of linguistic units is shown to follow the same principles as the organization of the content of the linguistic units. The phonological shapes of verbs in morphological classes can be organized into natural categories, like other natural and cultural objects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bybee, J. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511750526 · Cited by 3,488
Self-citationCroft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803864 · Cited by 3,316
Regular morphology and the lexicon
Bybee, J. (1995) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969508407111 · Cited by 1,541
Self-citationA neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model
Ullman, M. T. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35094573 · Cited by 997
The ubiquity of frequency effects in first language acquisition
AMBRIDGE, B., KIDD, E., ROWLAND, C. F., & THEAKSTON, A. L. (2015) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s030500091400049x · Cited by 589
The Declarative/Procedural Model of Lexicon and Grammar
Ullman, M. T. (2001) · Journal of Psycholinguistic Research · doi:10.1023/a:1005204207369 · Cited by 508
Marchman, V. A., Wulfeck, B., & Weismer, S. E. (1999) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/jslhr.4201.206 · Cited by 233
Wagner, T. (2017) · Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching · doi:10.14746/ssllt.2017.7.3.9 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Bybee, J. L., & Moder, C. L.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1983-06
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975930388
- Cited by
- 592
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.