The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Resolving the Neogrammarian Controversy
Abstract
Recent investigations of the history of Chinese have given new support to the view that sound change diffuses gradually across the lexicon. Yet instrumental studies of sound change in progress support the Neogrammarian position that change affects all words that include the sound according to their phonetic environment. The paradox can be resolved by distinguishing abstract phonological change from change in low-level output rules. Both types of rules can be observed in recent studies of sound change in progress in Philadelphia: the lexical split of short a shows lexical diffusion in progress, while raising, lowering, fronting, and backing rules show Neogrammarian regularity. A review of the literature on completed changes and other changes in progress tends to support the relevance of a hierarchy of abstractness in determining the nature of the transition from one stage to the other.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Flege, J. E. (1987) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30537-6 · Cited by 1,148
Flege, J. E. (1991) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.400473 · Cited by 371
Introduction to frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure
Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. J. (2001) · Typological Studies in Language · doi:10.1075/tsl.45.01byb · Cited by 373
Identity Effects in Morphological Truncation
Benua, L. (1995) · doi:10.7282/t38p5xk5 · Cited by 277
Gorba, C., & Cebrian, J. (2021) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2021.101094 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Labov, W.
- Venue
- Language
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-06
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 267
- ISSN
- 0097-8507 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993973549
- Cited by
- 497
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Resolving the Neogrammarian Controversy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/413692
- The paper
- Labov, W. (1981). Resolving the Neogrammarian Controversy. Language. https://doi.org/10.2307/413692
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
