The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Causes of Terrorism
Abstract
Terrorism occurs both in the context of violent resistance to the state as well as in the service of state interests. If we focus on terrorism directed against governments for purposes of political change, we are considering the premeditated use or threat of symbolic, low-level violence by conspiratorial organizations. Terrorist violence communicates a political message; its ends go beyond damaging an enemy's material resources.' The victims or objects of terrorist attack have little intrinsic value to the terrorist group but represent a larger human audience whose reaction the terrorists seek. Violence characterized by spontaneity, mass participation, or a primary intent of physical destruction can therefore be excluded from our investigation. The study of terrorism can be organized around three questions: why terrorism occurs, how the process of terrorism works, and what its social and political effects are. Here the objective is to outline an approach to the analysis of the causes of terrorism, based on comparison of different cases of terrorism, in order to distinguish a common pattern of causation from the historically unique. The subject of terrorism has inspired a voluminous literature in recent years. However, nowhere among the highly varied treatments does one find a general theoretical analysis of the causes of terrorism. This may be because terrorism has often been approached from historical perspectives, which, if we take Laqueur's work as an example, dismiss explanations that try to take into account more than a single case as exceedingly vague or altogether wrong. 2 Certainly existing general accounts are often based on assumptions that are neither explicit nor factually demonstrable. We find judgments centering on social factors such as the permissiveness and affluence in which Western youth are raised or the imitation of dramatic models encouraged by television. Alternatively, we encounter political explanations that blame revolutionary ideologies, Marxism-Leninism or nationalism, governmental weakness in giving in to terrorist demands, or conversely government oppres
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Staircase to Terrorism: A Psychological Exploration.
Moghaddam, F. M. (2005) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.60.2.161 · Cited by 1,208
Legitimacy and Deterrence Effects in Counterterrorism Policing: A Study of Muslim Americans
Tyler, T. R., Schulhofer, S., & Huq, A. Z. (2010) · Law & Society Review · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5893.2010.00405.x · Cited by 370
A false dichotomy? Mental illness and lone-actor terrorism.
Corner, E., & Gill, P. (2015) · Law and Human Behavior · doi:10.1037/lhb0000102 · Cited by 362
Calibrating risk for violent political extremists and terrorists: the VERA 2 structured assessment
Elaine Pressman, D., & Flockton, J. (2012) · The British Journal of Forensic Practice · doi:10.1108/14636641211283057 · Cited by 123
“This is a political movement, friend”: Why “incels” support violence
O'Donnell, C., & Shor, E. (2022) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12923 · Cited by 105
Terrorism and the macroeconomy: Evidence from Pakistan
Mehmood, S. (2014) · Defence and Peace Economics · doi:10.1080/10242694.2013.793529 · Cited by 68
Acosta, B. (2016) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/0022343315618001 · Cited by 32
Terrorism and the Varieties of Civil Liberties
Rubin, M. A., & Morgan, R. K. (2021) · Journal of Global Security Studies · doi:10.1093/jogss/ogaa032 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Crenshaw, M.
- Venue
- Comparative Politics
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1981-07
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 379
- ISSN
- 0010-4159 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2015780861
- Cited by
- 1,169
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.