Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,244

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Rise of Anthropological Theory

Loizos, Peter, Harris, Marvin·1970·The British Journal of Sociology

Abstract

With the agreement of author and publisher, pre-publication copies of The Rise of Anthropological Theory (New York: Crowell, 1968) were sent for review to 25 scholars. Of these, the followingf responded in time for their reviews to be included here: Olga Akhmanova, Milton Altschuler, B. Bernardi, Jan Bouzek, K. 0. L. Burridge, Jorge Dias, Marshall Durbin, Alan Howard, Malcolm McFee, Donald S. Marshall, William R. Merrifield, Harry M. Raulet, Takao Sofue, John Tu Er-wei, L. F. Watson, and Walter S. Wilson. Printed below are the author's precis (which reviewers received along with the book), the reviews, and the author's replies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/588281

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Loizos, P., & Harris, M.
Venue
The British Journal of Sociology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1970-03
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
114
ISSN
0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019141112
Cited by
1,244
References
0
FWCI
378.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.