The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The Pattern of Human Concerns
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,001
What Do Happiness Data Mean? Theory and Survey Evidence
Benjamin, D. J., Guzman, J. D., Fleurbaey, M., Heffetz, O., & Kimball, M. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28438 · Cited by 24
Szemenyei, E., Reinhardt, M., Szabó, E., Szabó, K.-G., Urbán, R., Harvey, S. T., Morgan, A., Demetrovics, Z., & Kökönyei, G. (2020) · Assessment · doi:10.1177/1073191118796558 · Cited by 22
“Cantril’s Ladder (Cantril, 1965).”
MethodCorell, M., Friberg, P., Petzold, M., & Löfstedt, P. (2024) · Archives of Public Health · doi:10.1186/s13690-024-01240-5 · Cited by 23
“Life satisfaction (LS) was measured with Cantril’s ladder [30].”
MethodCan Sport Really Help to Meet the Millennium Development Goals? Evidence From Children in Peru
Pawlowski, T., Schüttoff, U., Downward, P. M., & Lechner, M. (2016) · Journal of Sports Economics · doi:10.1177/1527002516661601 · Cited by 23
“The ladder, as a representation of well-being, was first developed by Cantril (1965). Health capital is measured as subjective health status and body mass index (BMI).”
BackgroundMeasuring happiness in the social sciences: An overview
Delsignore, G., Aguilar‐Latorre, A., & Oliván‐Blázquez, B. (2021) · Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1177/1440783321991655 · Cited by 25
“…article – the Subjective Happiness Scale (Lyubomirsky and Lepper, 1999), the Satisfaction with Life Scale (Diener et al., 1985) and Cantril’s Ladder (Cantril, 1965) – are self-perception univariable scales that measure the evaluation that people make of their own lives or happiness (and what…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAdoptees facing adolescence: What accounts for their psychological well‐being?
Ranieri, S., Ferrari, L., Danioni, F., Canzi, E., Barni, P., Rosnati, R. R., & Román, M. (2021) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2021.03.005 · Cited by 23
Comparing Well-being Across Nations: Conceptual and Empirical Issues
Tov, W., & Au, E. W. M. (2013) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199557257.013.0035 · Cited by 23
Demographic determinants of perceived well-being in eight European countries
Davis, E. E., Fine‐Davis, M., & Meehan, G. (1982) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00300432 · Cited by 23
Validación de las escalas de bienestar, de florecimiento y afectividad
Cassaretto, M., & Uribe, P. M. (2017) · Pensamiento Psicológico · doi:10.11144/javerianacali.ppsi15-1.vefa · Cited by 23
New-type urbanization, well-being of residents, and the response of land spatial planning
Ming-xing, C., Zhou, Y., Tang, Q., & Liu, Y. (2020) · 自然资源学报 · doi:10.31497/zrzyxb.20200602 · Cited by 23
“…目标实现也是关键的影响因素,对未来过高的期待以及与现实的反差会导致人们福祉水 平的下降 [51,52] 。此外,大量研究表明,个人的社会经济地位和健康状况也是福祉水平重要 的预测因素。在家庭与人际关系方面,家人亲友和所属群体在物质上和精神上的社会支 持能够舒缓心理压力,从而增进个人的福祉。已有研究表明,已婚者的福祉水平往往高 于未婚或离异者 [49,53] 。参加社会组织有助于社会资本的积累和福祉的增进 [54,55] [40] Diener 等 [41] Gurin 等 [42] Andrews 等 [43] Russell [44] Watson 等 [45] 说明”
Gandy, W. M., Coberley, C. R., Pope, J. E., & Rula, E. Y. (2013) · Population Health Management · doi:10.1089/pop.2012.0120 · Cited by 23
“21 Each domain is weighted equally in the calculation of the IWBS, as they are in the WBI, and scores range from 0 to 100 for each respondent.”
Meeting the Psychosocial Needs of Sibling Survivors
Buchbinder, D. K., Casillas, J., & Zeltzer, L. K. (2010) · Journal of Pediatric Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1177/1043454210384601 · Cited by 23
“Zeltzer et al. (2008) used the SF-36 (Ware, Snow, & Kosinski, 1993) and the LOL (Cantril, 1965) to study HRQOL and life satisfaction of survivors and a sibling survivor control group.”
MethodThe challenge of cross-cultural quality of life assessment
Bullinger, M. (1997) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870449708406742 · Cited by 23
Lin, Y.-C. (2010) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9683-7 · Cited by 23
“Life satisfaction was evaluated through the ‘Cantril ladder’ which measures young people’s global assessment of their lives ( Cantril 1965 ).”
MethodA longitudinal examination of lifestyles
Horley, J. (1992) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00286559 · Cited by 23
Understanding Intra-Group Variations in Prejudice — The Role of Perceived Legitimacy and Stability
Finchilescu, G., & de la Rey, C. (1991) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/008124639102100405 · Cited by 23
Cardinal Utility: A History of Hedonimetry
Ellingsen, T. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-0888-1_4 · Cited by 23
Discriminators of perceived dietary adequacy among the rural elderly
Learner, R., & Kivett, V. R. (1981) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(21)04824-0 · Cited by 23
Trends in prevalence of overweight and obesity: are Portuguese adolescents still increasing weight?
Marques, A., & de Matos, M. G. (2015) · International Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s00038-015-0758-8 · Cited by 22
“Life satisfaction was assessed by the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale (Cantril 1965).”
MethodHolmes, A., Carlisle, T., Vale, Z., Hatvani, G., Heagney, C., & Jones, S. (2016) · Australasian Psychiatry · doi:10.1177/1039856216669916 · Cited by 22
Does the ICECAP-O cover the physical, mental and social functioning of older people in the UK?
Hackert, M. Q. N., van Exel, J. N. A., & Brouwer, W. B. F. (2018) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-018-2042-x · Cited by 21
“Cantril’s Ladder [22] comprises a visual analogue scale (VAS) in the shape of a ladder ranging from 0 (worst possible life) at the bottom to 10 (best possible life) at the top, on which participants can indicate how they perceive their life.”
BackgroundMethodTemporal dimensions of reported life satisfaction in a low-income, agricultural environment
Adams, H., Bell, A. R., & Tamal, M. E. H. (2019) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-11187-240429 · Cited by 22
“Life satisfaction was measured using the Cantril self-anchoring scale (Cantril 1965), also used in the Gallop world polls and, as such, the World Happiness Report.”
Ciria-Barreiro, E., Moreno-Maldonado, C., Rivera, F., & Moreno, C. (2021) · LGBT Health · doi:10.1089/lgbt.2020.0477 · Cited by 25
Yoon, S., An, S., Noh, D. H., Tuan, L., & Lee, J. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0259000 · Cited by 25
“We calibrated levels of life satisfaction and aspirations gap by using an adapted version of the Cantril Ladder [51], where respondents were asked to indicate where they thought that they were at the present time and five years from the present using a zero (the worst) to nine (the best) scale.”
Lemij, A. A., de Glas, N. A., Derks, M. G. M., Bastiaannet, E., Merkus, J. W. S., Lans, T. E., van der Pol, C. C., van Dalen, T., Vulink, A. J. E., van Gerven, L., et al. (2022) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-022-06583-7 · Cited by 23
“Follow-up at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after diagnosis consisted of multiple assessments and questionnaires, including cognition (MMSE), physical function (TUG), functional status (GARS), quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-BR23) [27, 28], the Cantril Ladder for overall patient satisfaction [29]; depression [30]…”
Methodvan Dijk, M. L., Loo, L. T., Vrijsen, J., van den Akker‐Scheek, I., Westerveld, S., Annema, M., van Beek, A. P., van den Berg, J., Boerboom, A. L., Bouma, A. J., et al. (2023) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06960-z · Cited by 24
“Psychological measures Wellbeing will be measured using the Cantril ladder, a visual scale on which participants have to score their life [39].”
MethodQuality of life of male outpatients with personality disorders or psychotic disorders: a comparison
Bouman, Y. H. A., van Nieuwenhuizen, C., Schene, A. H., & de Ruiter, C. (2008) · Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health · doi:10.1002/cbm.703 · Cited by 22
Møller, V., Theuns, P., Erstad, I., & Bernheim, J. (2007) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9225-0 · Cited by 22
“Conventional measures of subjective wellbeing typically use a scale with abstract or hypothetical values ranging from ‘delighted’ to ‘terrible’, the ‘best’ or ‘worst possible’, or ‘very satisfied’ to ‘very dissatisfied’ (Andrews and Withey 1976; Cantril 1965 ).”
BackgroundAre Most People Happy? Exploring the Meaning of Subjective Well-Being Ratings
Ponocny, I., Weismayer, C., Stross, B., & Dressler, S. G. (2015) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-015-9710-0 · Cited by 22
“Well-known approaches to tackling the latter issue are the Cantril ladder (1965), which invokes a comparison with the ‘‘best possible life’’, or the usage of anchor vignettes (King et al.”
BackgroundHendriks, A. M., Bartels, M., Stevens, G. W. J. M., Walsh, S. D., Torsheim, T., Elgar, F. J., & Finkenauer, C. (2019) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/0272431619858413 · Cited by 25
“Life satisfaction was measured with the Cantril ladder of life satisfaction (Cantril, 1965), adapted for use with adolescent samples by omitting the part asking to imagine the best and worst possible life (Levin & 542 T ab le 1 .”
MethodPuvill, T., Kusumastuti, S., Lund, R., Mortensen, E. L., Slaets, J. P. J., Lindenberg, J., & Westendorp, R. G. J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224421 · Cited by 23
Moreno‐Agostino, D., de la Torre‐Luque, A., de la Fuente, J., Lara, E., Martín‐María, N., Moneta, M. V., Bayes‐Marin, I., Olaya, B., Haro, J. M., Miret, M., et al. (2020) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-020-00248-2 · Cited by 23
Baker, F., Denniston, M. M., Hann, D. M., Gesme, D. H., Reding, D. J., Flynn, T. J., & Kennedy, J. (2007) · Journal of Psychosocial Oncology · doi:10.1300/j077v25n02_01 · Cited by 22
“Earlier research using the SLDS-C showed concurrent validity with the Cantril Self-Anchoring Ladder of Life, a scale using a ladder format for respondents to indicate their overall satisfaction with present, past, or future life (Baker et al., 1996).”
MethodInfluentialNafarrate, E. G., & Casas, F. (2011) · International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social · doi:10.1174/021347411797361284 · Cited by 22
“FASE V Validez de constructo Correlaciones mediante la r de Con bienestar subjetivo (SLSS y (convergente) Pearson SASS) y felicidad (FHM).”
BackgroundInfluentialCardiac nursing: Achieving Competent Practitioners
Riley, J. P., Brodie, L., & Shuldham, C. M. (2005) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.01.002 · Cited by 22
Leelakulthanit, O., & Day, R. L. (1992) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00300509 · Cited by 22
Reminiscence Intervention in Nursing Homes: What and Who Changes?
Berghorn, F. J., & Schafer, D. E. (1987) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.2190/bk83-8xme-kfjx-ud2g · Cited by 22
Psychosocial aspects of occupational injury
Allodi, F., & Montgomery, R. (1979) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/bf00583570 · Cited by 22
The Effect of Social Cohesion on Subjective Individual Quality of Life in European Countries
Bottoni, G., & Addeo, F. (2024) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-023-03284-6 · Cited by 27
“The other three dimensions (health, wealth and safety) represent principal sources of quality of life as several studies have pointed out (Andrews & Withey, 1974; Campbell, 1981; Campbell et al., 1976; Cantril, 1965).”
Exploring the Impact of a Character Strengths Intervention on Well-Being in Indian Classrooms
Khanna, P., Singh, K. K., & Proctor, C. (2021) · School Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s12310-021-09450-w · Cited by 24
“Accordingly, this research also includes measurement of psychological (six dimensions of Ryff’s (1989) model), social (five dimensions of Keyes’ (1998) model), and emotional (affect balance (Bradburn, 1969) and quality of life (Cantril, 1965) models) well-being and happiness by way of the Mental Health Continuum-Short…”
MethodPojęcia i koncepcje dobrostanu: przegląd i próba uporządkowania
Karaś, D. (2019) · Studia Psychologica Theoria et praxis · doi:10.21697/sp.2019.19.2.01 · Cited by 25
Mental health profiles of Finnish adolescents before and after the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic
Gustafsson, J., Lyyra, N., Jasinskaja‐Lahti, I., Simonsen, N., Lahti, H., Kulmala, M., Ojala, K., & Paakkari, L. T. (2023) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-023-00591-1 · Cited by 34
A Unified Algorithm for Penalized Convolution Smoothed Quantile Regression
Man, R., Pan, X., Tan, K. M., & Zhou, W. (2023) · Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics · doi:10.1080/10618600.2023.2275999 · Cited by 21
Moriya, S., Tei, K., Murata, A., Muramatsu, M., Inoue, N., & Miura, H. (2011) · Gerodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00597.x · Cited by 21
Anderson, R. T., Baran, R. W., Dietz, B., Kallwitz, E. R., Erickson, P., & Revicki, D. A. (2013) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0505-7 · Cited by 21
“(v2) subscales scores [20], the Ladder Scale overall rating of health adapted from Cantril [21], and HCV symptoms checklist total score.”
MethodInfluentialMeasuring Mood: Considerations and Innovations for Nutrition Science
Polak, M., Richardson, A. C., Flett, J. A. M., Brookie, K., & Conner, T. (2015) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b18563-8 · Cited by 20
“…are you with your life as a whole these days?” answered from 0 “not at all satisfied” to 10 “completely satisfied” (OECD, 2013), the 1-item Cantril Scale (Cantril, 1965), which asks people to place themselves on a ladder where the bottom step (0) represents the “worst possible life for you” and…”
BackgroundPredictors of life satisfaction in the United Arab Emirates: Results based on Gallup data
Lambert, L., Karabchuk, T., & Joshanloo, M. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-00873-3 · Cited by 22
Durbeej, N., McDiarmid, S., Sarkadi, A., Feldman, I., Punamäki, R., Kankaanpää, R., Andersen, A. J., Hilden, P. K., Verelst, A., Derluyn, I., et al. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04995-8 · Cited by 21
“General well-being and life satisfaction will be assessed using the Cantril ladder [55].”
Social well-being and North Sea Oil: An application of subjective social indicators
Knox, P. L. (1976) · Regional Studies · doi:10.1080/09595237600185451 · Cited by 21
A longitudinal study of age‐associated memory impairment
Snowdon, J. A., & Lane, F. (1994) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.930091003 · Cited by 21
“Subjects were asked to rate themselves (and interviewers rated them) on Cantril Ladder Scales (Cantril, 1965), range 1-9, on physical health, memory, depression, anxiety, alcohol and drug abuse, and recent pain.”
BackgroundA Structural Model of Well-Being: With an Application to German DataPreprint
van Praag, B. M. S., Frijters, P., & Ada Ferrer-i-carbonell, A. (2000) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.243904 · Cited by 21
“With respect to 'satisfaction with life as a whole' Cantril (1965) developed a question module, which has been asked in various forms since 1965 to over a million of respondents in thousands of questionnaires all over the world (see Veenhoven, 1997).”
‘Alienated’ black youth: An investigation of ‘conventional wisdom’ explanations
GASKELL, G. D., & Smith, P. (1981) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.1981.9975680 · Cited by 21
Asian Development Outlook 2020 Update:
Bank, A. D. (2020) · Asian development outlook update · doi:10.22617/fls200256-3 · Cited by 31
Lucchini, M., & Assi, J. (2012) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0043-7 · Cited by 20
Scarpa, M. P., Zopluoglu, C., & Prilleltensky, I. (2021) · Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1002/jcop.22725 · Cited by 20
Wiegmann, S., Ernst, M., Ihme, L., Wechsung, K., Kalender, U., Stöckigt, B., Richter-Unruh, A., Vögler, S., Hiort, O., Jürgensen, M., et al. (2022) · BMC Endocrine Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12902-022-01079-3 · Cited by 20
Growth mindset and life and job satisfaction: the mediatory role of stress and self-efficacy
Kondratowicz, B., & Godlewska‐Werner, D. (2022) · Health Psychology Report · doi:10.5114/hpr/152158 · Cited by 20
An Interdependent Approach to Happiness and Well-Being
Uchida, Y., & Rappleye, J. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26260-9 · Cited by 20
The Measurement of Regional Growth and Wellbeing
Morrison, P. S. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23430-9_16 · Cited by 20
Understanding the Experience of Myotonic Dystrophy. Mixed Method Study
Geirdal, A. Ø., Lund‐Petersen, I., & Heiberg, A. (2014) · Journal of Genetic Counseling · doi:10.1007/s10897-014-9752-1 · Cited by 20
“The response alternatives are 0–10 (0=worst possible quality of life, 5=half-way between worst and best, 10=best possible quality of life) (Cantril 1965).”
BackgroundProblem Behavior of Boys and Young Men After Parental Divorce in the Netherlands
Spruijt, E., & Duindam, V. (2005) · Journal of Divorce & Remarriage · doi:10.1300/j087v43n03_08 · Cited by 20
“• degree of well-being, the mental health measured by the Cantril ladder (Cantril, 1965): We would like to know how you feel (from 1 = very bad to 10 = very well).”
MethodOECD (2010) · OECD eBooks · doi:10.1787/9789264079588-8-en · Cited by 20
Solving the income-happiness paradox
Khalil, E. L. (2022) · International Review of Economics · doi:10.1007/s12232-022-00398-0 · Cited by 23
Kuijer, R. G., de Ridder, D. T. D., Colland, V. T., Schreurs, K. M. G., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (2006) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/14768320600843226 · Cited by 20
“In addition, patients indicated their quality of life on a ladder from 0 to 10 (Cantril, 1965).”
BackgroundMethodPu, C., Huang, N., Tang, G.-J., & Chou, Y. (2011) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-166 · Cited by 20
Social Psychiatric Impairment: Racial Comparisons
Schwab, J. J., McGinnis, N. H., & Warheit, G. J. (1973) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.130.2.183 · Cited by 20
The Global Challenge of Jihadist Terrorism: A Quality-of-Life Model
Sirgy, M. J., Joshanloo, M., & Estes, R. J. (2018) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-017-1831-x · Cited by 19
“This construct was measured using Cantril Ladder of Life Scale (Cantril 1965).”
MethodCitizen-centric Smart City Development
Zakzak, L. (2019) · Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research · doi:10.1145/3325112.3325236 · Cited by 19
“There is a number of tools and projects employed by the “Happiness Agenda” team to discover people’s needs, such as Cantril Ladder (Cantril, 1965), Portrait Values Questionnaire PVQ 3 (Schwartz et al., 2001), SPANE 4 Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (Diener et al. , 2009), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)…”
MethodInfluentialHeintzelman, S. J., & Kushlev, K. (2020) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2020.1789701 · Cited by 19
Görzig, A., Blaya, C., Bedrosova, M. J., Audrin, C., & Macháčková, H. (2022) · The Journal of Early Adolescence · doi:10.1177/02724316221078826 · Cited by 21
“The life satisfaction measure was adapted from a ladder measure developed by Cantril (1965) and used by the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study (Currie et al., 2010).”
MethodBjerregaard, P., Larsen, C. V. L., Olesen, I., Ottendahl, C. B., Backer, V., Senftleber, N. K., Christensen, M. M. B., Larsen, T. J., Byberg, S., Hansen, T. F., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Circumpolar Health · doi:10.1080/22423982.2022.2090067 · Cited by 19
“The following measurement scales of mental health were applied: Life satisfaction (Cantril’s ladder) [28], selfesteem [29], self-efficacy [30], well-being (SWEMWBS) [31], loneliness and signs of mental illness (Kessler 6) [32].”
MethodChanges in Subjective Well-Being in India
Kulkarni, V. S., Kulkarni, V. S., Gaiha, R., & Imai, K. S. (2023) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-023-03115-8 · Cited by 19
Social cognition, socioeconomic status and subjective well-being of Chinese migrant workers
Huang, W., Su, S., Sun, X., & Zhang, Y. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56710-1 · Cited by 25
Kärner, A., Nilsson, S., Jaarsma, T., Andersson, A., Wiréhn, A.-B., Wodlin, P., Hjelmfors, L., & Tingström, P. (2012) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-13-110 · Cited by 19
“The secondary outcomes to be measured in this study in order to determine the long-term effect of PBL versus home-sent patient information regarding self-care are: selfefficacy in general [32], healthy diet [33] and physical exercise [34-36]; well-being [37,38].”
BackgroundMethodEthnic differences in youth well-being: The role of sociodemographic background and social support
Rúnarsdóttir, E. M., & Vilhjálmsson, R. (2015) · Scandinavian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1177/1403494815588644 · Cited by 19
“One is life-satisfaction measured by Cantril’s ladder [26].”
MethodMeasuring Women's Psychological Well-Being in Indonesia
Eggleston, E., Wong, E. L., Hardee, K., Irwanto, I., Poerwandari, E. K., & Severy, L. J. (2001) · Women & Health · doi:10.1300/j013v32n04_02 · Cited by 21
“” However, an extensive literature search located only a small number of published studies of psychological well-being conducted in developing countries (Schwarzer et al., 1997; Lee, Kim and Shinn, 1982; Devins et al., 1997; Cantril, 1967), and few of these focused on women.”
BackgroundMorris, E. A., Mondschein, A. S., & Blumenberg, E. (2018) · Journal of Transport and Land Use · doi:10.5198/jtlu.2018.934 · Cited by 19
Trott, A., & Reeves, A. (2018) · Counselling and Psychotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/capr.12163 · Cited by 25
Fernández, M. B., & Lay, S. L. (2018) · Journal of Women & Aging · doi:10.1080/08952841.2018.1537690 · Cited by 19
Köhler, A. K., Jaarsma, T., Tingström, P., & Nilsson, S. (2020) · BMC Cardiovascular Disorders · doi:10.1186/s12872-020-01647-2 · Cited by 19
“Well-being [38] was assessed using the Cantril Ladder of Life, a single-item indicator with a ladder of steps numbered from zero at the bottom to 10 at the top.”
MethodCulture Moderates the Relation Between Gender Inequality and Well-Being
Li, C., Zuckerman, M., & Diener, E. (2021) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797620972492 · Cited by 19
“Life satisfaction was measured with Cantril’s (1965) 11-step ladder scale.”
MethodIllness perceptions and quality of life amongst women with pseudotumor cerebri
Kesler, A., Kliper, E., Goner‐Shilo, D., & Benyamini, Y. (2009) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02625.x · Cited by 19
“Global QOL was rated on the Cantril self-anchoring ladder [21] asking participants to rate their current life ranging from 0 = the worst possible life for me to 10 = the best possible life for me .”
MethodAnalyse du concept qualité de vie dans le contexte des personnes âgées avec incapacités physiques
Levasseur, M., Tribble, D. S., & Desrosiers, J. (2006) · Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.2182/cjot.05.0013 · Cited by 19
Happiness and Globalization: A Spatial Econometric Approach
Lin, C. A., Lahiri, S., & Hsu, C.-P. (2016) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-016-9793-2 · Cited by 19
Structural elements of material well-being: An empirical test among people on social security
Groenland, E. A. G. (1990) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00303832 · Cited by 19
Happiness Studies and Legal Policy
Huang, P. H. (2010) · Annual Review of Law and Social Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-102209-152828 · Cited by 20
Rondung, E., Leiler, A., Sarkadi, A., Bjärtå, A., Lampa, E., Löfving, S. G., Calam, R., Oppedal, B., Keeshin, B., & Warner, G. (2022) · Pilot and Feasibility Studies · doi:10.1186/s40814-022-00998-1 · Cited by 18
“Secondary assessments included measures of self-efficacy (General Self-Efficacy Scale; GSE [38]) and wellbeing (Cantril Ladder [39]), both of which relate to the TRT programme theory of change.”
BackgroundMarteinsdottir, I., Ernerudh, J., Jonasson, L., Kristenson, M., & Garvin, P. (2016) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-016-9553-z · Cited by 18
“In addition, Cantril’s measure of global quality of life (ladder of life) was used as a measure of life satisfaction and positive outlook [33].”
MethodPérez-Sousa, M. Á., Olivares, P. R., Ramírez‐Vélez, R., & Gusi, N. (2021) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.07.006 · Cited by 18
Kaman, A., Otto, C., Adedeji, A., Devine, J., Erhart, M., Napp, A.-K., Becker, M., Blanck-Stellmacher, U., Fertmann, R., Saier, U., et al. (2021) · Nervenheilkunde · doi:10.1055/a-1397-5400 · Cited by 18
“Die Lebenszufriedenheit der Kinder und Jugendlichen wurde mit der Cantril Ladder erfasst [20].”
BackgroundOutcomes of Open Adoption from Care
Ward, H., Moggach, L., Tregeagle, S., & Trivedi, H. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-76429-6 · Cited by 18
Prognostic value of cardiovascular disease status: the Leiden 85-plus study
van Peet, P. G., Drewes, Y. M., de Craen, A. J. M., Westendorp, R. G. J., Gussekloo, J., & de Ruijter, W. (2012) · AGE · doi:10.1007/s11357-012-9443-5 · Cited by 18
“In those with MMSE scores above 18, Cantril’s Ladder of Life with a score from 1 to 10 (optimal) points was used as a measure of general well-being (Cantril 1965) and the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) with scores ranging from 0 (optimal) to 15 points was used to screen for depressive symptoms (de Craen et a…”
MethodSocial Support, Social Networks, and Happiness of Individuals With Visual Impairments
Papadopoulos, K. S., Papakonstantinou, D., Koutsoklenis, A., Koustriava, E., & Kouderi, V. (2014) · Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0034355214535471 · Cited by 18
“The measure of happiness used in this study is similar to the Cantril Scale (Cantril, 1965), which has been used by Kef (2002).”
MethodValuing Informal Care Experience: Does Choice of Measure Matter?
Mentzakis, E., McNamee, P., Ryan, M., & Sutton, M. (2011) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9873-y · Cited by 18
“as (in descending order) economic, health, family, personal values, status quo, job situation, international/world situation, social values and political ( Cantril 1965; Easterlin 1974).”
BackgroundHow peoples’ ratings of dental implant treatment change over time?
Machuca, C., Vettore, M., & Robinson, P. (2020) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02408-1 · Cited by 14
“The self-anchored scale was designed as an individualized variant of the ideals scale [25] to assess perceived oral health and RS and was based on the Cantril’s ladder [26].”
Methodvan Boekel, L. C., Cloïn, M., & Luijkx, K. G. (2019) · The International Journal of Aging and Human Development · doi:10.1177/0091415019871204 · Cited by 18
Scheeren, A. M., Howlin, P., Bartels, M., A, L. K. M., & Begeer, S. (2021) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.2653 · Cited by 17
“Adults with autism or their legal representatives rated respectively their own life or the life of the person with autism on an 11-point scale where “10” indicates the best life they can imagine and “0” indicates the worst life they can imagine (Cantril, 1965).”
BackgroundHerens, M. C., van Ophem, J. A. C., Wagemakers, A., & Koelen, M. A. (2015) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/s40064-015-1336-5 · Cited by 18
“Health-related quality of life data were measured using: a visual analogue scale for perceived health (EQVAS), ranging from 0 to 100 (The EuroQol Group 1990); Cantril’s ladder for life satisfaction, ranging from 0 to 10 (Cantril 1965; Peters et al. 2012); and the SoC threeitem, three-point scale for sense of coherence…”
MethodEffects of Concerns About Child Care Among Single, Employed Black Mothers with Preschool Children
Jackson, A. P. (1997) · American Journal of Community Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1024686901147 · Cited by 18
“Life satisfaction was measured by a single-item scale that assesses global life satisfaction ( Cantril, 1965 ).”
MethodPattern of Psychological Fitness as Related to Pattern of Physical Fitness among Older Adults
Netz, Y., Tenenbaum, G., & Sagiv, M. S. (1988) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.1988.67.2.647 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Zubaida, S. D., & Cantril, H.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1967
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 212
- ISSN
- 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4243094222
- Cited by
- 1,496
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 8.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- human concern, human nature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review