The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year.
The Pattern of Human Concerns
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The PERMA-Profiler: A brief multidimensional measure of flourishing.
Butler, J., & Kern, M. L. (2016) · International Journal of Wellbeing · doi:10.5502/ijw.v6i3.526 · Cited by 1,485
On the promotion of human flourishing
VanderWeele, T. J. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1702996114 · Cited by 1,387
Mental Illness and Mental Health: The Two Continua Model Across the Lifespan
Westerhof, G. J., & Keyes, C. L. M. (2010) · Journal of Adult Development · doi:10.1007/s10804-009-9082-y · Cited by 1,345
“In the social sciences, this tradition dates back to survey research in the 1960s and 1970s, when scholars started to study the quality of American life from the perspective of citizens themselves (Andrews and Withey 1976; Bradburn 1969; Campbell et al. 1976; Cantril 1965; Gurin et al. 1960).”
BackgroundMethodCulture and Subjective Well-Being
Tov, W., & Diener, E. (2009) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2352-0_2 · Cited by 1,305
“It should be noted that very little quantitative work has examined the wellbeing of small cultures (e.g., Biswas-Diener, Vitterso, & Diener, 2005), although a number of international surveys of SWB in modern nations have been conducted (e.g., Cantril, 1965; Inglehart, 1990; see Table 1). Only recently has research exa…”
BackgroundRelative Deprivation: A Theoretical and Meta-Analytic Review
Smith, H. J., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. M., & Bialosiewicz, S. (2012) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868311430825 · Cited by 1,255
“For example, a popular method for measuring RD, the Cantril–Kilpatrick Self-Anchoring Scale (Cantril, 1965), has respondents place themselves on a 10-step ladder with the top rung labeled as the best possible life and the bottom rung as the worst possible life.”
MethodEconomic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. J. (2008) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w14282 · Cited by 1,121
Subjective Well-Being: A General Overview
Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009) · South African Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1177/008124630903900402 · Cited by 1,381
Schwartz, C. E., & Sprangers, M. A. G. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00047-7 · Cited by 829
A snapshot of the age distribution of psychological well-being in the United States
Stone, A. A., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Deaton, A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1003744107 · Cited by 803
The quality of life scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization
Burckhardt (2003) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-1-60 · Cited by 789
“With the possible exception of Cantril's ladder [11], no other QOL instrument currently in general circulation has been developed with such extensive attention to diversity and individual perspective.”
Change in Level of Positive Mental Health as a Predictor of Future Risk of Mental Illness
Keyes, C. L. M., Dhingra, S. S., & Simoes, E. J. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2010.192245 · Cited by 778
“The MIDUS measured emotional well-being with a 6-item scale derived in part from Bradburn’s(29) scale of positive affect (cheerful, in good spirits, happy, calm or peaceful, satisfied, and full of life during the past 30 days) and a single item of life satisfaction (0=worst possible life overall these days to 10=best…”
MethodInfluentialThe Role of Person Versus Situation in Life Satisfaction: A Critical Examination.
Heller, D. A., Watson, D., & Ilieș, R. (2004) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.4.574 · Cited by 836
Social Support from Parents and Friends and Emotional Problems in Adolescence
Helsen, M., Vollebergh, W., & Meeus, W. (2000) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1023/a:1005147708827 · Cited by 723
“(b) The Cantril ladder (Cantril, 1965) measures the feeling of general wellbeing and happiness.”
BackgroundZeltzer, L. K., Recklitis, C., Buchbinder, D., Zebrack, B., Casillas, J., Tsao, J. C. I., Lu, Q., & Krull, K. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.21.1433 · Cited by 660
A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health
Fordyce, M. (1988) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00302333 · Cited by 682
Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox
Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2008) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.1353/eca.0.0001 · Cited by 545
Promoting older adults’ well-being through Internet training and use
Shapira, N., Barak, A., & Gal, I. (2007) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607860601086546 · Cited by 501
“This instrument (Cantril, 1965) consisted of a vertical scale, from 0–10, on which participants marked the degree of satisfaction with their lives at three points in time: currently, five years ago and, as an estimate, in five years time.”
BackgroundMeasures of Subjective Well-Being
Andrews, F. M., & Robinson, J. P. (1991) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-590241-0.50007-1 · Cited by 508
Subjective Well-Being in Mental Health and Human Development Research Worldwide: An Introduction
Keyes, C. L. M. (2006) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-005-5550-3 · Cited by 493
“Hedonic, or emotional, well-being is a specific dimension of subjective well-being that consists of perceptions of avowed interest in life, happiness and satisfaction with life, and the balance of positive to negative affect (Cantril, 1965; Bradburn, 1969; Bryant and Veroff, 1982; Dieneret al., 1985; Lucas et al., 199…”
BackgroundRapkin, B. D., & Schwartz, C. E. (2004) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-2-14 · Cited by 500
Quality of life after spinal cord injury: a meta analysis of the effects of disablement components
Dijkers, M. P. J. M. (1997) · Spinal Cord · doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3100571 · Cited by 459
Aknin, L. B., De Neve, J.-E., Dunn, E. W., Fancourt, D. E., Goldberg, E., Helliwell, J. F., Jones, S. P., Karam, E., Layard, R., Lyubomirsky, S., et al. (2022) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/17456916211029964 · Cited by 418
“For instance, one tool commonly used to measure life evaluations is the Cantril ladder (Cantril, 1965), which”
MethodLife Satisfaction Across the Lifespan: Findings from Two Nationally Representative Panel Studies
Baird, B. M., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9584-9 · Cited by 440
“For instance, in studies of cross-national samples, Cantril (1965) and Inglehart (1990) found almost no differences across age groups in the percentage of people who indicated that they were “very happy.” Diener and Suh (1998) examined subjective well-being in many nations around the world and found that life satisfac…”
BackgroundInfluentialOn the trail of the gold standard for subjective well-being
Cummins, R. A. (1995) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf01079026 · Cited by 430
The satisfaction with life scale: Psychometrics properties in an adolescent sample
Neto, F. F. M. (1993) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf01536648 · Cited by 409
Understanding subjective well-being: perspectives from psychology and public health
Das, K., Jones-Harrell, C., Fan, Y., Ramaswami, A., Orlove, B., & Botchwey, N. D. (2020) · Public health reviews · doi:10.1186/s40985-020-00142-5 · Cited by 515
Studies on identity development in adolescence: An overview of research and some new data
Meeus, W. (1996) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf01537355 · Cited by 365
Reliability and Validity of an Adapted Version of the Cantril Ladder for Use with Adolescent Samples
Levin, K. A., & Currie, C. E. (2013) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-013-0507-4 · Cited by 391
“The Cantril Ladder (Cantril 1965), also known as Cantril’s Self-Anchoring Ladder of Life Satisfaction, or the Cantril Ladder of Life, measures life satisfaction by first asking the respondent to imagine their life in the best possible light and to describe their hopes and wishes for the future.”
BackgroundMethodGulliksson, M., Burell, G., Vessby, B., Lundin, L., Toss, H., & Svärdsudd, K. (2011) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.510 · Cited by 349
Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Problem Behavior During Adolescence
Deković, M. (1999) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1023/a:1021635516758 · Cited by 341
“Second measure, Cantril ladder ( Cantril, 1965 ), is a single-item measure that assesses feelings of general well-being and happiness.”
BackgroundRegensteiner, J. G., Hiatt, W. R., Coll, J. R., Criqui, M. H., Treat‐Jacobson, D., McDermott, M. M., & Hirsch, A. T. (2008) · Vascular Medicine · doi:10.1177/1358863x07084911 · Cited by 344
Developing Measures of Perceived Life Quality: Results from Several National Surveys
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (2005) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3742-2_3 · Cited by 333
The Impact of Menopausal Symptoms on Quality of Life, Productivity, and Economic Outcomes
Whiteley, J., Dibonaventura, M., Wagner, J., Alvir, J., & Shah, S. N. (2013) · Journal of Women's Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2012.3719 · Cited by 310
GENERAL STRAIN, STREET YOUTH AND CRIME: A TEST OF AGNEW'S REVISED THEORY*
Baron, S. W. (2004) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00526.x · Cited by 328
In Pursuit of Three Theories: Authoritarianism, Relative Deprivation, and Intergroup Contact
Pettigrew, T. F. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033327 · Cited by 354
“One prevalent example involves the Cantril-Kilpatrick Self-Anchoring Scale (Cantril 1965).”
BackgroundDeveloping measures of perceived life quality: Results from several national surveys
Andrews, F. M., & Withey, S. B. (1974) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00286419 · Cited by 334
Schimmack, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2008) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9230-3 · Cited by 341
“Since the seminal contributions of Andrews and Withey (1976) and Cantril (1965) , the scientific study of happiness has become a popular topic in the social sciences (Diener et al. 1999; Frey and Stutzer 2002; Kahneman 1999; Michalos 1985; Veenhoven 1994).”
BackgroundHAPPINESS ECONOMICS FROM 35 000 FEET
MacKerron, G. (2012) · Journal of Economic Surveys · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00672.x · Cited by 320
Borg, C., Hallberg, I. R., & Blomqvist, K. (2006) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01375.x · Cited by 313
“In addition, the questionnaire included measures assessing self-esteem (Rosenberg 1979), resilience (Wagnhild & Young 1990), spheres of control (Paulhus & van Selst 1990), negative and positive affect (Watson et al. 1988) and the Cantril ladder scale ( Cantril 1965 ), although not reported here.”
MethodSubjective Wellbeing as an Affective-Cognitive Construct
Davern, M. T., Cummins, R. A., & Stokes, M. A. (2007) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-007-9066-1 · Cited by 311
“Indeed, contemporaneously with Bradburn (1969), Cantril (1965) took this other track to measuring wellbeing through the development of his ‘self-anchoring striving scale.’ This scale employs a determinedly cognitive task, in which respondents are asked to place their best and their worst imagined life at either end of…”
MethodBartels, M. (2015) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-015-9713-y · Cited by 293
“The Netherlands Twin Register adopted three wellbeing measure in their longitudinal cohort study (the Satisfaction With Life Scale (Diener et al. 1985), the Subjective Happiness Scale (Lyubomirski and Lepper 1999), and the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale (Cantril 1965).”
MethodCapabilities and Well-Being: Evidence Based on the Sen–Nussbaum Approach to Welfare
Anand, P., Hunter, G., & Smith, R. P. (2005) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-005-6518-z · Cited by 329
Some Psychological Aspects of Reduced Consumption Behavior
Young, R. D. (1996) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916596283005 · Cited by 316
Absolute Income, Relative Income, and Happiness
Ball, R., & Chernova, K. (2007) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-007-9217-0 · Cited by 303
“Easterlin based his arguments on data from a variety of surveys; most relevant to the present paper is his analysis of data collected by Cantril (1965) in 14 countries during the late 1950s and early 1960s.”
BackgroundMichalos, A. C. (1980) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00461152 · Cited by 299
Differences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking Across 63 Countries
Chopik, W. J., O’Brien, E., & Konrath, S. (2016) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022116673910 · Cited by 301
“The first source is subjective well-being data on 59 countries taken from the Gallup World Poll using the Cantril Ladder of Life Scale (Cantril, 1965; Gallup, 2009; Helliwell, Layard, & Sachs, 2013).”
MethodHow the World Changed Social Media
Miller, D., Costa, E., Haynes, N., McDonald, T., Nicolescu, R., Sinanan, J., Spyer, J., Venkatraman, S., & Wang, X. (2016) · UCL Press eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1g69z35 · Cited by 440
Subjective Well-Being Around the World: Trends and Predictors Across the Life Span
Jebb, A. T., Morrison, M., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2020) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797619898826 · Cited by 282
“Our life-satisfaction measure was the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale (Cantril, 1965), which asks respondents to evaluate their current life on a ladder scale with steps ranging from 0 (worst possible life) to 10 (best possible life).”
MethodJoo, S. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-75734-6_2 · Cited by 277
“The pioneer work of developing a financial satisfaction measure was conducted by Cantril (1965) .”
BackgroundMeasures of self-reported well-being: their affective, cognitive, and other components
Andrews, F. M., & McKennell, A. C. (1980) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00286474 · Cited by 266
Michalos, A. (1980) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3742-2_10 · Cited by 371
“(Cantril 1965, p. 201) Campbell (1972) reported that nearly half of the relatively poor white American respondents in a ‘large-scale urban survey’ described themselves as ‘very satisfied’ with their housing.”
Backgroundde Vries, L. P., Baselmans, B. M. L., & Bartels, M. (2020) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-020-00324-7 · Cited by 288
“1985), the Cantril ladder (Cantril 1965), or the Subjective Happiness Scale (Lyubomirsky and Lepper 1999).”
The impact of chronic venous leg ulcers: a systematic review
Green, J., Jester, R., McKinley, R. K., & Pooler, A. (2014) · Journal of Wound Care · doi:10.12968/jowc.2014.23.12.601 · Cited by 259
A Global Perspective on Happiness and Fertility
Margolis, R., & Myrskylä, M. (2011) · Population and Development Review · doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00389.x · Cited by 255
“although cross-national comparisons of happiness are standard (Cantril 1965; deaton 2008; diener, Helliwell, and Kahneman 2010), the validity of these comparisons may be questionable as people from different backgrounds, languages, and cultures may use different scales in reporting happiness.”
BackgroundAda Ferrer-i-carbonell, A., & van Praag, B. M. S. (2002) · Health Economics · doi:10.1002/hec.696 · Cited by 247
Kjell, O., Daukantaité, D., Hefferon, K., & Sikström, S. (2015) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-015-0903-z · Cited by 264
“The Ladders of Life (Cantril 1965) was adapted.”
MethodOn the Trail of the Gold Standard for Subjective Well-Being
Cummins, R. A. (2005) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3742-2_18 · Cited by 242
Lundqvist, C. (2011) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2011.584067 · Cited by 304
“While the ‘good life’ of humans has engaged philosophers for centuries (see review by Ryan & Deci, 2001 ), the research interest in human well-being began after 1960 (eg, Cantril, 1965 ; Gurin, Veroff, & Feld, 1960 ).”
BackgroundSocial connectedness as a source and consequence of meaning in life
Stavrova, O., & Luhmann, M. (2015) · The Journal of Positive Psychology · doi:10.1080/17439760.2015.1117127 · Cited by 278
“To measure life satisfaction, MIDUS included the Cantril Self-Anchoring Scale (Cantril, 1965).”
MethodDiseth, Å., Danielsen, A. G., & Samdal, O. (2012) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2012.657159 · Cited by 269
“A one-item scale has proven to be a valid and item-efficient measurement of life satisfaction is the Cantril SelfAnchoring Striving Scale (Cantril, 1965).”
BackgroundEvaluation of champs, a physical activity promotion program for older adults
Stewart, A. L., Mills, K. M., Sepsis, P. G., King, A. C., McLellan, B. Y., Roitz, K. B. A., & Ritter, P. L. (1997) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02895154 · Cited by 234
“Life satisfaction was assessed using a nine-point ladder scale that has been validated ( 32 ,33); a parallel item was developed to assess satisfaction with social life.”
MethodEvaluating the impact of medical care and technologies on the quality of life: A review and critique
Najman, J. M., & Levine, S. (1981) · Social Science & Medicine Part F Medical and Social Ethics · doi:10.1016/0271-5392(81)90012-5 · Cited by 231
Shmotkin, D. (2005) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.9.4.291 · Cited by 233
“Classical contributions delineated SWB as an indicator of quality of life and mental health (Andrews & Withey, 1976; Brad- burn, 1969; Campbell, Converse, & Rodgers, 1976; Cantril, 1965; Gurin, Veroff, & Feld, 1960).”
BackgroundMethodMeasures of Self-Reported Well-Being: Their Affective, Cognitive, and other Components
Andrews, F. M., & McKennell, A. C. (2005) · Social indicators research series · doi:10.1007/1-4020-3742-2_9 · Cited by 228
Meeus, W., Iedema, J., Maassen, G. H., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2004) · Journal of Adolescence · doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2004.07.003 · Cited by 253
“(b) The Cantril ladder (Cantril, 1965) for measuring general well being and happiness.”
Special interests and subjective wellbeing in autistic adults
Grove, R., Hoekstra, R. A., Wierda, M., & Begeer, S. (2018) · Autism Research · doi:10.1002/aur.1931 · Cited by 225
Exploring the Association Between Well-Being and Psychopathology in Adolescents
Bartels, M., Cacioppo, J. T., van Beijsterveldt, T. C. E. M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2013) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-013-9589-7 · Cited by 233
“(3) Quality of life in general (QLg) was assessed with the Cantril Ladder (Cantril 1965).”
MethodJoshanloo, M., & Jovanović, V. (2019) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-019-00998-w · Cited by 264
“Life satisfaction The ladder of life scale (Cantril 1965) was used to measure life satisfaction.”
MethodBorn to be Happy? The Etiology of Subjective Well-Being
Bartels, M., & Boomsma, D. I. (2009) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/s10519-009-9294-8 · Cited by 217
“Quality of life at the moment of measurement (QLp) was also assessed with the Cantril Ladder (Cantril 1965).”
MethodInfluentialOtt, J. C. (2009) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-009-9144-7 · Cited by 216
“The present analysis draws on responses to a survey question, developed by Cantril (1965), which reads as follows: Suppose we say that the top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom of the ladder represents the worst possible life for you.”
MethodHorley, J., & Lavery, J. J. (1995) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf01079200 · Cited by 214
Subjective well‐being and human welfare around the world as reflected in the Gallup World Poll
Diener, E., & Tay, L. (2015) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1002/ijop.12136 · Cited by 212
“variables, cognitive well-being – namely, life satisfaction – was measured using Cantril’s selfanchoring ladder (1965), and ranged from 0 (worst life you can imagine for yourself) to 10 (best life you can imagine for yourself).”
MethodDyadic coping within couples dealing with breast cancer: A longitudinal, population-based study.
Rottmann, N., Hansen, D. G., Larsen, P. V., Nicolaisen, A., Flyger, H., Johansen, C., & Hagedoorn, M. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000218 · Cited by 231
Social indicators of perceived life quality
Andrews, F. M. (1974) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00303860 · Cited by 207
The validity of measures of self-reported well-being
Andrews, F. M., & Crandall, R. (1976) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00286161 · Cited by 206
Quality of life following a false positive mammogram
Gram, I., Lund, E., & Slenker, S. E. (1990) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.1990.430 · Cited by 205
Diminishing Marginal Utility of Income? Caveat Emptor
Easterlin, R. A. (2005) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8393-4 · Cited by 209
Ott, J. C. (2010) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9719-z · Cited by 202
“The present analysis draws on responses to a survey question, developed by Cantril (1965), which reads as follows: Suppose we say that the top of the ladder represents the best possible life for you and the bottom of the ladder represents the worst possible life for you.”
MethodBuilding a Better Theory of Well-BeingPreprint
Easterlin, R. A. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.392043 · Cited by 207
Bases teóricas de bem-estar subjetivo, bem-estar psicológico e bem-estar no trabalho
Siqueira, M. M. M., & Rossi, V. A. (2008) · Psicologia Teoria e Pesquisa · doi:10.1590/s0102-37722008000200010 · Cited by 297
Curbow, B. A., Somerfield, M. R., Baker, F., Wingard, J. R., & Legro, M. W. (1993) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf00844815 · Cited by 198
Risk and Resistance Factors in the Adaptation of Parents of Children with Severe Physical Disability
Sloper, P., & Turner, S. (1993) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb00978.x · Cited by 193
The Structure of the Genetic and Environmental Influences on Mental Well-Being
Keyes, C. L. M., Myers, J., & Kendler, K. S. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2010.193615 · Cited by 201
Subjective Well-Being Decreasing With Age: New Research on Children Over 8
Casas, F., & González‐Carrasco, M. (2018) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13133 · Cited by 194
Geirdal, A. Ø., Ruffolo, M., Leung, J., Thygesen, H., Price, D., Bonsaksen, T., & Schoultz, M. (2021) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2021.1875413 · Cited by 217
“The response alternatives are between 0 and 10 with 0 ¼ worst possible QoL and 10 ¼ best possible QoL (Cantril, 1965).”
BackgroundMethodAngell, S. Y., McConnell, M. V., Anderson, C. A. M., Bibbins-Domingo, K. B., Boyle, D. S., Capewell, S., Ezzati, M., de Ferranti, S. D., Gaskin, D. J., Goetzel, R. Z., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000758 · Cited by 195
A Randomized Trial of Family Caregiver Support in the Home Management of Dementia
Mohide, E. A., Pringle, D. M., Streiner, D. L., Gilbert, J. R., Muir, G., & Tew, M. (1990) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb03544.x · Cited by 184
Satisfaction with Leisure Time Activities
Francken, D. A., & van Raaij, W. V. (1981) · Journal of Leisure Research · doi:10.1080/00222216.1981.11969498 · Cited by 186
Life satisfaction, self-concept, and relationship with parents in adolescence
Leung, J. P., & Leung, K. Y. (1992) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/bf01538737 · Cited by 179
“For example, life satisfaction is related to a number of demographic variables including age, gender, employment status, education, and marital status (Andrews and Withey, 1976; Campbell, 1981; Campbell et al., 1976; Cantril, 1965).”
BackgroundFinancial behaviours of consumers in credit counselling
Xiao, J. J., Sorhaindo, B., & Garman, E. T. (2005) · International Journal of Consumer Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2005.00455.x · Cited by 178
Subjective well-being as a function of age and gender: A multivariate look for differentiated trends
Shmotkin, D. (1990) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/bf00293643 · Cited by 177
A multicountry perspective on gender differences in time use during COVID-19
Giurge, L. M., Whillans, A. V., & Yemiscigil, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2018494118 · Cited by 186
Interdisciplinary Geriatric Primary Care Evaluation and Management: Two‐Year Outcomes
Burns, R. A., Nichols, L. O., Martindale-Adams, J. L., & Graney, M. J. (2000) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03021.x · Cited by 175
A concept analysis of health‐related quality of life in young people with chronic illness
Taylor, R. M., Gibson, F., & Franck, L. S. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02379.x · Cited by 173
Keyes, C. L. M., & Westerhof, G. J. (2012) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/13607863.2011.596811 · Cited by 209
“To measure life satisfaction, respondents rated ‘their life overall these days’ on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 meant the ‘worst possible life overall’ and 10 meant ‘the best possible life overall’ (Cantril, 1965).”
BackgroundEvaluative and hedonic wellbeing among those with and without children at home
Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1311600111 · Cited by 170
Levin, K., Dallago, L., & Currie, C. (2011) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-011-9804-y · Cited by 8
“Young people were shown a picture of a ladder and asked: Here is a picture of a ladder— the top of the ladder 10 is the best possible life for you and the bottom is the worst possible life—in general where on the ladder do you feel you stand at the moment? This adapted version of the Cantril Ladder ( Cantril 1965 ) ha…”
MethodBuilding Financial Satisfaction
Vera‐Toscano, E., Ateca-Amestoy, V., & del Rosal, R. S. (2005) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-005-2614-3 · Cited by 168
Casas, F., Bello, A., González, M., & Aligué, M. (2013) · Child Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s12187-013-9182-x · Cited by 168
“Additionally, the only psychometric scale assessing well-being included in a few of the international databases is the single-item scale named the “Cantril ladder” (Cantril 1965).”
BackgroundResultJovanović, V., & Lazić, M. (2018) · Applied Research in Quality of Life · doi:10.1007/s11482-018-9680-6 · Cited by 184
Metadata
- Authors
- Zubaida, S. D., & Cantril, H.
- Venue
- The British Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1967
- Volume
- 18
- Pages
- 212
- ISSN
- 0007-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4243094222
- Cited by
- 1,496
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 106 · 2022: 90 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 87 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 71 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 50
- FWCI
- 8.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- British Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- human concern, human nature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
