Cited by 22Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Measuring Psychological Inflexibility in Children and Adolescents: Evaluating the Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth

Szemenyei, Eszter, Reinhardt, Melinda, Szabó, Edina, Szabó, Krisztina-Gabriella, Urbán, Róbert, Harvey, Shane T., Morgan, Antony, Demetrovics, Zsolt +1 more·2020·Assessment

Abstract

The Avoidance and Fusion Questionnaire for Youth (AFQ-Y8) was developed to measure psychological inflexibility. Although the questionnaire is a well-known tool in clinical practice, its psychometric properties have not been widely investigated in the target population of children and adolescents. The purpose of this study was to investigate the factor structure and validity of the AFQ-Y8 ( N = 1,572, mean age 15.39 years, girls 51%) on a Hungarian sample. We also tested the invariance of the measurement model across two age groups (11-14 and 15-20 years old). Results confirmed the single-factor structure of the AFQ-Y8. Psychological inflexibility was also found to be positively related to emotional instability, externalizing, and internalizing problems. Furthermore, psychological inflexibility explained the variance of life satisfaction when personality dimensions, emotional, and behavioral problems were accounted for. Measurement invariance across age groups was partially supported. These results suggest that the AFQ-Y8 is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing psychological inflexibility in children and adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1073191118796558

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 57 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szemenyei, E., Reinhardt, M., Szabó, E., Szabó, K.-G., Urbán, R., Harvey, S. T., Morgan, A., Demetrovics, Z., & Kökönyei, G.
Affiliations
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
  • Semmelweis University (HU)
  • Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
Corresponding author
Kökönyei, Gyöngyi
Venue
Assessment
Published
2018-09-09
Volume
27
Issue
8
Pages
1810-1820
ISSN
  • 1073-1911 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3489
OpenAlex
W2891165297
Cited by
22
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Assessment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline (submittedVersion)
Funders
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia (K111938)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
psychological inflexibility, children and adolescents, factor structure, psychometric validation, measurement invariance, age differences, neuroticism, externalizing problems, internalizing problems, life satisfaction, Hungarian youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affective Symptoms, Child, Emotions, Female, Humans, Hungary, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review