The Calculated Frightfulness of Ashur Nasir Apal
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The innovator of the tactic of calculated frightfulness seems to have been Tukultī-Ninurta II.
“the innovator of this tactic seems to have been Tukultī-Ninurta II”
From A New Reconstruction of the Reigns of Adad-nārārī II and Tukultī-Ninurta II in Light of Five Unattributed Royal Inscriptions (2023) · cites this paper as Olmstead (1918)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assyria: Ashur-Dan II to Ashur-Nirari V (954–745 B.C.)
Grayson, A. K. (1982) · The Cambridge Ancient History · doi:10.1017/chol9780521224963.007 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Edmonds, A. J. (2023) · Journal of Ancient Near Eastern History · doi:10.1515/janeh-2023-0004
- Authors
- Olmstead, A. T.
- Corresponding author
- Olmstead, A. T.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oriental Society
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1918
- Volume
- 38
- Pages
- 209
- ISSN
- 0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2319663776
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis
- Keywords
- Assyrian literature, Assyrian kingship
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
