Cited by 119Traditional Chinese Medicine StudiesHistory of Medicine StudiesHistory of Science and Medicine

The Doctrine of the Three Humors in Traditional Indian Medicine and the Alleged Antiquity of Tamil Siddha Medicine

Scharfe, Hartmut·1999·Journal of the American Oriental Society

Abstract

Hartmut Scharfe, The Doctrine of the Three Humors in Traditional Indian Medicine and the Alleged Antiquity of Tamil Siddha Medicine, Journal of the American Oriental Society, Vol. 119, No. 4 (Oct. - Dec., 1999), pp. 609-629

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/604837

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Major differences among Suśruta, Caraka and Vāgbhaṭa were minimised by later commentators in order to present Ayurveda as a consistent, integrated whole.

    “Major differences among the three authors were minimised by later commentators in order to present Ayurveda as a con- sistent, integrated whole.”

    From The Sikh Foundations of Ayurveda (2008) · cites this paper as Scharfe 1999

  • The Indian understanding of the three defects developed in religious and medical texts from the last few centuries BCE through the first millennium CE.

    “The Indian understanding of these three defects developed in religious and medical texts from the last few centuries BCE through the first millennium CE. 7”
  • In the earliest Ayurvedic writings, such as the Carakasaṃhitā compiled by the third century CE, doṣa originally referred to an abnormality of Wind, Bile, and Phlegm that needed to be quelled or removed to restore health.

    “In the earliest Ayurvedic writings, such as the Carakasaṃ hitā (compiled by the third century CE), the term doṣ a seems to have originally referred to an abnormality of Wind, Bile, and Phlegm that needed to be quelled or removed in order to return to health.”
  • By the time of the Aṣṭāṅgasaṃgraha and Aṣṭāṅgahṛdaya in the seventh century CE, doṣa denoted permanent bodily features that needed to be kept in balance to prevent disease.

    “By the time of the compilation of the Aṣ ṭ ānġasaṃ graha and Asṭ ānġahṛ daya (by the seventh century CE), however, the doṣ a had come to denote permanent features of the body that needed to be kept in balance in order to prevent disease.”
  • In the Ayurvedic medical corpus composed in later centuries, mostly in northern India, the three are eventually called doṣa and given a preeminent role in etiology.

    “Nevertheless, in the Ayurvedic medical corpus composed in subsequent centuries, mostly in northern India, the three are eventually called doṣ a and are given a preeminent role in etiology.”

Authors
Scharfe, H.
Corresponding author
Scharfe, Hartmut
Venue
Journal of the American Oriental Society
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1999-10
Volume
119
Issue
4
Pages
609
ISSN
0003-0279 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2087318704
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the American Oriental Society (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
Keywords
doshas, traditional Indian medicine, history of medicine, Ayurveda, Siddha medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review