The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Landscape Sensitivity and Change
Abstract
The general concepts generated by modern studies of geomorphological processes are examined in terms of their utility for models of long-term landform evolution. The work is summarized by four fundamental propositions of landform genesis. These include the idea that each set of environments is represented by constant processes and characteristic landforms which tend to persist over time. 'Geomorphological' time is divided into the time taken to attain this characteristic state and the time over which it persists. The systems and forms are subject, over Io2-Io5 years, to perturbations caused by high magnitude-low frequency events, environmental change and internal structural instabilities which initiate change. The responses to these impulses are complex and include damped, sustained and reinforcing changes taking place by ubiquitous, linear or diffusive propagation which reflect the sensitivity of the landscape to change. This sensitivity is dependent on the path density of the process and the strength of the coupling between the system components and has two end members, mobile-sensitive systems and slowly responding-insensitive areas. Some of the results include the concepts of (i) relief and pattern persistence; (2) stagnancy of development and the hypothesis of unequal activity; (3) convergence of form; (4) the concept of transient forms; (5) stability-instability phases and episodic landscape evolution, which together form a coherent framework for long-term landform evolution. Davis's great mistake was the assumption that we know the processes involved in the development of land forms. We don't; and until we do we shall be ignorant of the general course of their development. LEIGHLY, 1940
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wildfire as a hydrological and geomorphological agent
Shakesby, R. A., & Doerr, S. H. (2006) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.10.006 · Cited by 1,346
State of science: mental workload in ergonomics
Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2015) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.956151 · Cited by 948
Initial hydrologic and geomorphic response following a wildfire in the Colorado Front Range
Moody, J. A., & Martin, D. A. (2001) · Earth Surface Processes and Landforms · doi:10.1002/esp.253 · Cited by 493
Kooi, H., & Beaumont, C. (1996) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/95jb01861 · Cited by 257
Soil Water Repellency: A Key Factor in Post-fire Erosion
Doerr, S., Shakesby, R., & MacDonald, L. (2009) · Fire Effects on Soils and Restoration Strategies · doi:10.1201/9781439843338-c7 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Brunsden, D., & Thornes, J. B.
- Venue
- Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1979
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 463
- ISSN
- 0020-2754 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2328303514
- Cited by
- 681
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Landscape Sensitivity and Change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/622210
- The paper
- Brunsden, D., & Thornes, J. B. (1979). Landscape Sensitivity and Change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.2307/622210
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.