Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comprehension Monitoring: What It Is and What We Know about It

Wagoner, Shirley A.·1983·Reading Research Quarterly

Abstract

COMPREHENSION MONITORING is defined as a metacognitive process which is affected by person, strategy, and task variables. It is viewed as an executive function, essential for competent reading, which directs the reader's cognitive processes as he/she strives to make sense of incoming textual information. While reading comprehension is of primary concern, studies of oral communication adequacy have been prominent in metacognitive research and are touched upon in this review. Considered more fully are studies of problem detection, i.e., of detecting inconsistencies in oral and written discourse with both listening and reading tasks. Self-report studies of problem detection and strategy use involving protocol analysis, interview data, and other self-report tasks are reviewed. Investigations which deal primarily with monitoring (fix-up) strategies are examined, even though studies dealing with recall (study) strategies are not included. Conclusions about research findings are drawn, suggestions are made regarding methodology, and instructional implications are suggested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/747392

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Wagoner, S. A.
Venue
Reading Research Quarterly
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1983
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
328
ISSN
0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1963870862
Cited by
174
References
0
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.