The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Naming Speed and Reading: The Contribution of the Cognitive Neurosciences
Abstract
THIS TWO-PART ESSAY discusses how research in the developmental cognitive neurosciences can contribute to an understanding of the complex relations between various aspects of naming and reading processes. The first section reviews findings from both neuropsychological and reading research on letter-naming and general naming speed, and analyzes the methodological differences between discrete-trial and continuous naming formats. The findings taken together suggest that the relations between subprocesses change both with development and as the cognitive requirements for naming and reading tasks become more differentiated. Findings from a number of studies also suggest the existence of a naming-rate deficit that differentiates dyslexic from average and garden-variety poor readers; this deficit appears to persist well into middle childhood. The second section speculates more broadly about whether the relations between naming and reading deficits are causal or associative, and also about associations between deficits in naming speed and deficits in motoric speed. These associations could be explained by the existence of a connector variable common to some processes in both language and motoric domains, such as a hypothesized precise timing mechanism that may inhibit the ability of some dyslexic readers to achieve rapid processing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fodor, J. A. (1983) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 · Cited by 7,734
Decoding, reading, and reading disability.
Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986) · Remedial and Special Education · doi:10.1177/074193258600700104 · Cited by 3,972
Toward an instance theory of automatization.
Logan, G. D. (1988) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.4.492 · Cited by 3,466
The nature of phonological processing and its causal role in the acquisition of reading skills
Wagner, R. K., & Torgesen, J. K. (1987) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.101.2.192 · Cited by 3,303
Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0 · Cited by 1,457
Cited by
Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisition
Share, D. L. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 · Cited by 2,352
Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hecht, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., Donahue, J., & Garon, T. (1997) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.3.468 · Cited by 1,077
Longitudinal Studies of Phonological Processing and Reading
Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949402700503 · Cited by 932
Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia
Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf01026919 · Cited by 663
Self-citationTorgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Burgess, S., & Hecht, S. (1997) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_4 · Cited by 641
Metadata
- Authors
- Wolf, M.
- Venue
- Reading Research Quarterly
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123
- ISSN
- 0034-0553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2020243704
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 18.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Naming Speed and Reading: The Contribution of the Cognitive Neurosciences. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/747978
- The paper
- Wolf, M. (1991). Naming Speed and Reading: The Contribution of the Cognitive Neurosciences. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/747978
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.