Cited by 15Digital Humanities and ScholarshipIndian and Buddhist StudiesLibraries, Manuscripts, and Books

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

From Birch Bark to Digital Data: Recent Advances in Buddhist Manuscript Research: Papers Presented at the Conference Indic Buddhist Manuscripts: The State of the Field. Stanford, June 15-19 2009

·2014·Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/j.ctt1vw0q4q

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Venue
Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks
Published
2014-02-25
OpenAlex
W4244575108
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Verlag der österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Digital Humanities and Scholarship
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books
Keywords
Buddhist manuscripts, digital humanities, digitization of manuscripts, Buddhist studies, textual transmission

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review