The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
Abstract
Foreword: Bill and Melinda Gates Preface: Peter Singer Acknowledgments Famine, Affluence, and Morality The Singer Solution to World Poverty What Should a Billionaire Give - and What Should You? Index
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Beyond sacrificial harm: a two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology
Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Caviola, L., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & Savulescu, J. (2018) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000093 · Cited by 434
Pogge, T. (2001) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/1467-9973.00172 · Cited by 334
A case for a duty to feed the hungry: GM plants and the third world
Carter, L. (2007) · Science and Engineering Ethics · doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y · Cited by 265
Schwitzgebel, E., & Rust, J. (2014) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2012.727135 · Cited by 175
Before “Fair Trade”: Empire, Free Trade, and the Moral Economies of Food in the Modern World
Trentmann, F. (2007) · Environment and Planning D: Society and Space · doi:10.1068/d448t · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Singer, P.
- Venue
- Princeton Readings in Political Thought
- Publisher
- Princeton University Press
- Published
- 2018-07-31
- Pages
- 677-684
- OpenAlex
- W190143826
- Cited by
- 1,656
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 796.34
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Famine, Affluence, and Morality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.67
- The paper
- Singer, P. (2018). Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Princeton Readings in Political Thought. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.67
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
