The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Priorities of Global Justice
Abstract
One‐third of all human deaths are due to poverty‐related causes, to malnutrition and to diseases that can be prevented or cured cheaply. Yet our politicians, academics, and mass media show little concern for how such poverty might be reduced. They are more interested in possible military interventions to stop human rights violations in developing countries, even though such interventions – at best – produce smaller benefits at greater cost. This Western priority may be rooted in self‐interest. But it engenders, and is sustained by, a deeply flawed moral presentation of global economic cooperation. The new global economic order we impose aggravates global inequality and reproduces severe poverty on a massive scale. On any plausible understanding of our moral values, the prevention of such poverty is our foremost responsibility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Church, J. A. (2001) · Journal of Government Information · doi:10.1016/s1352-0237(01)00307-0 · Cited by 9,153
Rawls, J. (1999) · Cited by 2,191
Famine, Affluence, and Morality
Singer, P. (2018) · Princeton Readings in Political Thought · doi:10.2307/j.ctv19fvzzk.67 · Cited by 1,656
What Can New Survey Data Tell Us about Recent Changes in Distribution and Poverty?
Ravallion, M., & Chen, S. (1997) · The World Bank Economic Review · doi:10.1093/wber/11.2.357 · Cited by 974
Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence.
Kamm, F. M., & Unger, P. (1999) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2998310 · Cited by 406
Cited by
Public Health Ethics: From Foundations and Frameworks to Justice and Global Public Health
Kass, N. E. (2004) · Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1111/j.1748-720x.2004.tb00470.x · Cited by 152
Can a MacIntyrian Care about Severely Disabled Strangers?
McCracken, G. (2022) · The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine · doi:10.1093/jmp/jhac029
Metadata
- Authors
- Pogge, T.
- Venue
- Metaphilosophy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 6-24
- ISSN
- 0026-1068 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9973
- OpenAlex
- W2095316439
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 97.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Priorities of Global Justice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/1467-9973.00172
- The paper
- Pogge, T. (2001). Priorities of Global Justice. Metaphilosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9973.00172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.