The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Arthropod Brains: Evolution, Functional Elegance, and Historical Significance
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As a third example of the great elaboration and specialization associated with consciousness, the more-advanced animal brains have the largest numbers of neuron types, with highly complex interactions (Strausfeld, 2012; Feinberg and Mallatt, 2016a; Hodge et al., 2019).”
From Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap (2020) · cites this paper as Strausfeld, 2012
In the citing paper
“In vertebrates, for instance, visual information is extensively processed in the retina, thalamus, parts of the cerebrum, and optic tectum; and in arthropods in the retina, lamina, medulla, lobula and central complex of the brain (Strausfeld, 2012; Feinberg and Mallatt, 2016a).”
From Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap (2020) · cites this paper as Strausfeld, 2012
In the citing paper
“For example, the central complex is extremely well-conserved across insect lineages and features in other arthropods too [83].”
From Phenomenal interface theory: a model for basal consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [83]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The neuronal architecture of the mushroom body provides a logic for associative learning
Aso, Y., Hattori, D., Yu, Y., Johnston, R. M., Iyer, N. A., Ngo, T.-T., Dionne, H., Abbott, L., Axel, R., Tanimoto, H., et al. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.04577 · Cited by 1,051
What insects can tell us about the origins of consciousness.
Barron, A. B., & Klein, C. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1520084113 · Cited by 446
Hulse, B. K., Haberkern, H., Franconville, R., Turner-Evans, D., Takemura, S.-Y., Wolff, T., Noorman, M., Dreher, M., Dan, C., Parekh, R., et al. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.66039 · Cited by 392
Deep homology of arthropod central complex and vertebrate basal ganglia.
Strausfeld, N. J., & Hirth, F. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231828 · Cited by 354
Self-citationThe functional organization of descending sensory-motor pathways in Drosophila
Namiki, S., Dickinson, M. H., Wong, A. M., Korff, W., & Card, G. M. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.34272 · Cited by 337
Metadata
- Authors
- Strausfeld, N. J.
- Corresponding author
- Strausfeld, Nicholas James
- Venue
- Harvard University Press eBooks
- Publisher
- Harvard University Press
- Published
- 2012-01-02
- OpenAlex
- W4243629783
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 6.11
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurology and Historical Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- arthropods, insect brain, insect neurobiology, insect cognition, insect behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review