The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Degrowth
Abstract
The term 'degrowth' has emerged within ecological and other heterodox schools of economics as a critique of the idea (and ideology) of economic growth. Degrowth argues that economic growth is no longer desirable - its costs exceed its benefits - and advocates a transformation of economies so that they produce and consume less, differently and better. Giorgos Kallis provides a clear and succinct guide to the central ideas of degrowth theory and explores what it would take for an economy to transition to a position that enables it to prosper without growth. The book examines how mainstream conceptualizations of the economy are challenged by degrowth theory and how degrowth draws on a multifaceted network of ideas across disciplines to shed new light on the economic process. The central claims of the degrowth literature are discussed alongside some key criticisms of them. Whether one agrees or disagrees with degrowth's critique of economic growth, Kallis shows how it raises fundamental questions about the workings of capitalism that we can no longer afford to ignore.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The myth of inevitable progressive order and economic growth justifies oppressive actions.
“The twin myths of inevitable progressive order and economic growth as something always necessary and desirable (cf.Kallis, 2018) justify oppressive actions with the aid of history as told from the perspective of the ever-shrinking minority who profit from the status quo.”
From Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures (2024) · cites this paper as Kallis, 2018
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020) · New Political Economy · doi:10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964 · Cited by 2,007
Self-citationKallis, G., Kostakis, V., Lange, S., Muraca, B., Paulson, S., & Schmelzer, M. (2018) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-025941 · Cited by 723
Self-citationWhat does degrowth mean? A few points of clarification
Hickel, J. (2021) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731.2020.1812222 · Cited by 401
Archaeology in 2022: Counter‐myths for hopeful futures
Collective, B. T., Berihuete‐Azorín, M., Blackmore, C., Borck, L., Flexner, J. L., Frieman, C. J., Herrmann, C. A., & Kiddey, R. (2024) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1111/aman.13940 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Kallis, G.
- Publisher
- Agenda Publishing
- Published
- 2018-06-30
- Cited by
- 206
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review