The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Role of Dissemination in Market Liquidity: Evidence from Firms' Use of Twitter™
Abstract
Firm disclosures often reach only a portion of investors, which results in information asymmetry among investors and, therefore, lower market liquidity. This issue is particularly salient for firms that are not highly visible, as they tend not to receive broad news dissemination via traditional intermediaries, such as the press. This paper examines whether firms can reduce information asymmetry by more broadly disseminating their news. To isolate the impact of dissemination, we focus our analysis on firms' use of Twitter and exploit the 140-character message restriction. Specifically, using a sample of technology firms, we examine the impact of using Twitter to send market participants links to press releases that are provided via traditional disclosure methods. We find this additional dissemination of firm-initiated news via Twitter is associated with lower abnormal bid-ask spreads and greater abnormal depths, consistent with a reduction in information asymmetry. Moreover, this result holds mainly for firms that are not highly visible, consistent with them being in greater need of this additional dissemination channel. We also examine the impact of dissemination on a volume-based measure of liquidity, and find that dissemination is positively associated with liquidity. Data Availability: All data are publicly available from the sources indicated in the paper.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity
Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725153 · Cited by 7,297
Disclosure, Liquidity, and the Cost of Capital
DIAMOND, D. W., & VERRECCHIA, R. E. (1991) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04620.x · Cited by 3,836
On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets
Stiglitz, J. E., & Grossman, S. J. (1980) · Columbia University · doi:10.7916/d8765r99 · Cited by 3,645
The Economic Consequences of Increased Disclosure
Leuz, C., & Verrecchia, R. E. (2000) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2672910 · Cited by 2,370
Do retail trades move markets?
Barber, B. M., Odean, T., & Zhu, N. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn035 · Cited by 903
Segment Profitability and the Proprietary and Agency Costs of Disclosure
Berger, P. G., & Hann, R. N. (2007) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.869 · Cited by 467
Cited by
Disclosure processing costs, investors’ information choice, and equity market outcomes: A review
Blankespoor, E., deHaan, E., & Marinovic, I. (2020) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2020.101344 · Cited by 1,076
Self-citationThe Role of Social Media in the Capital Market: Evidence from Consumer Product Recalls
LEE, L. F., HUTTON, A. P., & SHU, S. (2015) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12074 · Cited by 434
Do Firms Strategically Disseminate? Evidence from Corporate Use of Social Media
Jung, M. J., Naughton, J. P., Tahoun, A., & Wang, C. (2018) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-51906 · Cited by 380
The Media and Mispricing: The Role of the Business Press in the Pricing of Accounting Information
Drake, M. S., Guest, N. M., & Twedt, B. J. (2014) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-50757 · Cited by 365
Big Data Analytics: Opportunity or Threat for the Accounting Profession?
Richins, G., Stapleton, A., Stratopoulos, T. C., & Wong, C. (2017) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-51805 · Cited by 361
Metadata
- Authors
- Blankespoor, E., Miller, G. S., & White, H. D.
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2013-07-01
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-112
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7967
- OpenAlex
- W2056060912
- Cited by
- 812
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 43.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Role of Dissemination in Market Liquidity: Evidence from Firms' Use of Twitter™. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/accr-50576
- The paper
- Blankespoor, E., Miller, G. S., & White, H. D. (2014). The Role of Dissemination in Market Liquidity: Evidence from Firms' Use of Twitter™. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50576
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.