The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Voluntary Disclosure Around the World
Open accessAbstract
We examine the impact of foreign institutional investors on firms' voluntary disclosure practices measured by management forecasts. In a sample of 32 non-U.S. countries, we find that, on average, foreign institutional investments lead to improved voluntary disclosure, and their impact is larger than that of domestic institutional investors. These results are more pronounced when foreign institutional investors (1) are unfamiliar with the firm's home country, (2) have longer investment horizons, and (3) are from countries with stronger investor protection and disclosure requirements than the firm's home country. However, we also find some evidence of voluntary disclosure deterioration in firms with foreign institutional investors from countries with inferior disclosure requirements and securities regulations and with concentrated foreign institutional ownership. Overall, our results suggest that the relation between foreign institutional investors and voluntary disclosure is much richer and more complex than what has been documented for domestic institutional investors in the literature.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/250042 · Cited by 18,025
Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models
Sobel, M. E. (1982) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/270723 · Cited by 12,810
Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches
Petersen, M. A. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhn053 · Cited by 10,746
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.00000005 · Cited by 4,337
Self-citationTrading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors
Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00226 · Cited by 3,955
The law and economics of self-dealing
Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2008) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.02.007 · Cited by 3,486
Home Bias at Home: Local Equity Preference in Domestic Portfolios
Coval, J. D., & Moskowitz, T. J. (1999) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00181 · Cited by 2,870
What Works in Securities Laws?
LA PORTA, R., LOPEZ‐DE‐SILANES, F., & SHLEIFER, A. (2006) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00828.x · Cited by 2,785
The financial reporting environment: Review of the recent literature
Beyer, A., Cohen, D. A., Lys, T. Z., & Walther, B. R. (2010) · Journal of Accounting and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.10.003 · Cited by 2,609
Why Firms Voluntarily Disclose Bad News
Skinner, D. J. (1994) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2491386 · Cited by 2,427
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsang, A., Xie, F., & Xin, X.
- Venue
- The Accounting Review
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2019-01-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 319-348
- ISSN
- 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7967
- OpenAlex
- W2734902516
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 46.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Voluntary Disclosure Around the World. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/accr-52353
- The paper
- Tsang, A., Xie, F., & Xin, X. (2019). Foreign Institutional Investors and Corporate Voluntary Disclosure Around the World. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.