Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 542

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cost Behavior and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts

Open access
Weiss, Dan·2010·The Accounting Review

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study examines how firms’ asymmetric cost behavior influences analysts’ earnings forecasts, primarily the accuracy of analysts’ consensus earnings forecasts. Results indicate that firms with stickier cost behavior have less accurate analysts’ earnings forecasts than firms with less sticky cost behavior. Furthermore, findings show that cost stickiness influences analysts’ coverage priorities and investors appear to consider sticky cost behavior in forming their beliefs about the value of firms. This study integrates a typical management accounting research topic, cost behavior, with three standard financial accounting topics (namely, accuracy of analysts’ earnings forecasts, analysts’ coverage, and market response to earnings surprises).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Adar, 1977, A comprehensive cost-volume-profit analysis under uncertainty, The Accounting Review, 52, 137
  2. Anderson, 2007, Understanding cost management: What can we learn from the evidence on “sticky costs”?, 10.2139/ssrn.975135 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.975135
  3. Baik, 2006, Self-selection in consensus analysts’ earnings forecasts, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 35, 141
  4. Balakrishnan, 2002, A critical overview of the use of full-cost data for planning and pricing, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 14, 3, 10.2308/jmar.2002.14.1.3 · doi:10.2308/jmar.2002.14.1.3
  5. Balakrishnan, 2004, Does capacity utilization affect the “stickiness” of costs?, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19, 283, 10.1177/0148558X0401900303 · doi:10.1177/0148558x0401900303
  6. Banker, 2006, Predicting earnings using a model based on cost variability and cost stickiness, The Accounting Review, 81, 285, 10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.285 · doi:10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.285
  7. Banker, 2008, Managerial optimism, prior-period sales changes, and sticky cost behavior, 10.2139/ssrn.1599284 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1599284
  8. Beja, 2006, Some informational aspects of conservatism, European Accounting Review, 15, 585, 10.1080/09638180601102156 · doi:10.1080/09638180601102156
  9. Chen, 2008, Managerial empire building, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs, 10.2139/ssrn.1014088 · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1014088
  10. Clement, 2003, Do investors respond to analysts’ forecast revisions as if forecast accuracy is all that matters?, The Accounting Review, 78, 227, 10.2308/accr.2003.78.1.227 · doi:10.2308/accr.2003.78.1.227
  11. Das, 1998, Earnings predictability and bias in analysts’ earnings forecasts, The Accounting Review, 73, 277
  12. Imhoff, 1992, The effect of ex ante earnings uncertainty on earnings response coefficients, The Accounting Review, 67, 427
  13. Kinney, 2002, Earnings surprise “materiality” as measured by stock returns, Journal of Accounting Research, 40, 1297, 10.1111/1475-679X.t01-1-00055 · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.t01-1-00055
  14. Kross, 1990, Earnings expectations: The analysts’ information advantage, The Accounting Review, 65, 461
  15. Lipe, 1990, The relation between stock returns and accounting earnings given alternative information, The Accounting Review, 65, 49
  16. Maher M., Lanen W., and Rajan M. 2006. Fundamentals of Cost Accounting. New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
  17. Weiss, 2008, Extracting forward-looking information from security prices: A new approach, The Accounting Review, 83, 1101, 10.2308/accr.2008.83.4.1101 · doi:10.2308/accr.2008.83.4.1101
  18. Wiedman, 1996, The relevance of characteristics of the information environment in the selection of a proxy for the market’s expectations for earnings: An extension of Brown, Richardson, and Schwager, Journal of Accounting Research, 34, 313, 10.2307/2491505 · doi:10.2307/2491505

Cited by

See all 542

Metadata

Authors
Weiss, D.
Venue
The Accounting Review
Published
2010-07-01
Volume
85
Issue
4
Pages
1441-1471
ISSN
  • 0001-4826 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-7967
OpenAlex
W2131479318
Cited by
542
References
39
FWCI
32.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cost Behavior and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441
The paper
Weiss, D. (2010). Cost Behavior and Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts. The Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2010.85.4.1441

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.