The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Internal Audit's Role in GHG Emissions and Energy Reporting: Evidence from Audit Committees, Senior Accountants, and Internal Auditors
Abstract
SUMMARY: Internationally, disclosures related to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and energy usage have increased dramatically due to trends toward increased sustainability reporting, growing concerns about climate change, and the introduction of new legislation and taxes. Audit committees, management, internal auditors, external auditors, and other stakeholders all have a potential role in relation to GHG disclosures. Our study addresses the role of internal auditors. We conducted 29 interviews with senior audit committee members, senior accountants, in-house internal auditors, and partners specializing in internal audit from the major accounting firms. These interviews allowed us to gain insights into the present role of internal auditors in GHG/energy reporting, the factors explaining internal audit's role, and the future role of internal audit. In addition, audit committee members describe their present involvement in GHG/energy reporting. We consider the consistency of our findings with three corporate governance theories (agency theory, institutional theory, and resource dependence theory). Although our results support the importance of effective monitoring consistent with agency theory, no one theory fully explains our results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910 · Cited by 7,641
Accounting for the effects of accountability.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255 · Cited by 2,383
The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note
Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009 · Cited by 2,069
Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr-10218 · Cited by 1,916
Accountability and the Perseverance of First Impressions
Tetlock, P. E. (1983) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3033716 · Cited by 513
The Case of Sustainability Assurance: Constructing a New Assurance Service *
O’Dwyer, B. (2011) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01108.x · Cited by 321
Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison
Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Corporate social responsibility research in accounting
Huang, X. ‘., & Watson, L. (2015) · Journal of Accounting Literature · doi:10.1016/j.acclit.2015.03.001 · Cited by 483
Moroney, R., & Trotman, K. T. (2016) · Contemporary Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1911-3846.12162 · Cited by 127
Self-citationDe Meyst, K., Cardinaels, E., & Van den Abbeele, A. G. H. L. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2645965 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Trotman, A. J., & Trotman, K. T.
- Venue
- AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2013-12-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 199-230
- ISSN
- 0278-0380 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7991
- OpenAlex
- W2068513887
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Internal Audit's Role in GHG Emissions and Energy Reporting: Evidence from Audit Committees, Senior Accountants, and Internal Auditors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2308/ajpt-50675
- The paper
- Trotman, A. J., & Trotman, K. T. (2015). Internal Audit's Role in GHG Emissions and Energy Reporting: Evidence from Audit Committees, Senior Accountants, and Internal Auditors. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-50675
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.