Accountability and the Perseverance of First Impressions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Telling reasoners they will have to justify their reasoning to other people can foster deep processing of contradictory information.
“A second way to foster deep processing of contradictory information is to tell reasoners that they will have to justify their reasoning to other people (Chaiken, 1980;Kruglanski & Freund, 1983;Tetlock, 1983).”
From The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. (1993) · cites this paper as Tetlock, 1983
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · see citing works
“Tetlock and Kim (1987) showed that subjects motivated to be accurate (because they expected to justify their beliefs to others) wrote more cognitively complex descriptions of persons whose responses to a personality test they had seen: They considered more alternatives and evaluated the persons from more perspectives,…”
BackgroundInfluentialIndividual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00003435 · Cited by 4,255 · see citing works
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.293 · Cited by 3,991 · see citing works
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Bottom, W. P., Gilovich, T. D., Griffin, D., & Kahneman, D. J. (2004) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/20159081 · Cited by 3,579 · see citing works
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
Kahneman, D., & Frederick, S. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.004 · Cited by 3,476 · see citing works
Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60317-2 · Cited by 3,367 · see citing works
Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (1986) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.93.2.136 · Cited by 3,174 · see citing works
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys
Krosnick, J. A. (1991) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350050305 · Cited by 2,487 · see citing works
“Clinical versus Actuarial Judgment.”
Dawes, R. M., Faust, D., & Meehl, P. E. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2648573 · Cited by 2,298 · see citing works
Accounting for the effects of accountability.
Lerner, J. S., & Tetlock, P. E. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.255 · Cited by 2,383 · see citing works
“They prepare themselves by engaging in an effortful and self-critical search for reasons to justify their actions (Lerner & Tetlock, 1994; Tetlock, 1983a; Tetlock & Lerner, in press; Tetlock et al., 1989).”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationSlovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2002) · Heuristics and Biases · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.025 · Cited by 2,349 · see citing works
(2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098 · Cited by 2,214 · see citing works
The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-r · Cited by 1,796 · see citing works
The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences
Gilovich, T., Vallone, R., & Tversky, A. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6 · Cited by 1,649 · see citing works
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model
Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90002-j · Cited by 1,596 · see citing works
Gender stereotypes and workplace bias
Heilman, M. E. (2012) · Research in Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.003 · Cited by 1,635 · see citing works
“Here the motivator is not accuracy but the need for approval, and the desire to present oneself in as favorable a light as possible (Tetlock, 1983b; Tetlock, Skitka, & Boettger, 1989).”
BackgroundCarpini, M. X. D., Cook, F., & Jacobs, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630 · Cited by 1,450 · see citing works
Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1993) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543063001001 · Cited by 1,393 · see citing works
“A second way to foster deep processing of contradictory information is to tell reasoners that they will have to justify their reasoning to other people (Chaiken, 1980; Kruglanski & Freund, 1983; Tetlock, 1983).”
BackgroundDitto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.568 · Cited by 1,329 · see citing works
Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0015701 · Cited by 1,292 · see citing works
“In contrast, satisfying accuracy motivation may require monitoring the direction and quality of the information as well as attending to and correcting for any systematic biases in exposure (e.g., Harkness, DeBono, & Borgida, 1985; McAllister, Mitchell, & Beach, 1979; Tetlock, 1983; Tetlock & Kim, 1987).”
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167 · see citing works
Prejudice as self-image maintenance: Affirming the self through derogating others.
Fein, S., & Spencer, S. J. (1997) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.31 · Cited by 1,047 · see citing works
“That is, unless other motives are activated, such as a goal of accurate perception (Darley, Fleming, Hilton, & Swann, 1988; Neuberg & Fiske, 1987), accountability (Tetlock, 1983), or social desirability or egalitarian motives (Dovidio & Gaertner, 1991; Monteith, 1993), people may find stereotyping and prejudice to be…”
BackgroundTwo Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism
Bovens, M. (2010) · West European Politics · doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486119 · Cited by 1,019 · see citing works
The Impact of Accountability on Judgment and Choice: Toward A Social Contingency Model
Tetlock, P. E. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60287-7 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Self-citationThe use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning.
Nisbett, R. E., Krantz, D. H., Jepson, C., & Kunda, Z. (1983) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.90.4.339 · Cited by 826 · see citing works
The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations
Castilla, E. J., & Benard, S. (2010) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
“This is also in accordance with considerable work in social psychology indicating that bias is more likely when decision makers feel that their judgment is unlikely to be closely scrutinized (Tetlock, 1983a, 1983b; Lerner and Tetlock, 1999).”
BackgroundResultDunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1082 · Cited by 758 · see citing works
Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers
Castilla, E. J. (2008) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/588738 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
“According to experimental research on accountability, when decision makers know they will be held accountable for their decisions, bias is less likely to occur (Tetlock 1983, 1985; Tetlock and Kim 1987).”
BackgroundJob Satisfaction and Psychological Well-Being as Nonadditive Predictors of Workplace Turnover
Wright, T., & Bonett, D. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306297582 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
Dunning, D. A., Meyerowitz, J. A., & Holzberg, A. D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.020 · Cited by 688 · see citing works
Moral identity and the expanding circle of moral regard toward out-groups.
Reed, A., & Aquino, K. F. (2003) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1270 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
“Unless other internal motivations are activated, such as a goal of accountability (Tetlock, 1983), social desirability and/or egalitarian motives (Dovidio & Gaertner, 1991), or self-image bolstered with a self-affirmation procedure (Fein & Spencer, 1997; Study 1), people may find the denigration of out-groups to be an…”
BackgroundTetlock, P. E. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.451 · Cited by 635 · see citing works
Self-citationHandbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics
Moramarco, D., Palmisano, F., & Peragine, V. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-57365-6 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
DOES DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY WORK
Ryfe, D. (2005) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.032904.154633 · Cited by 547 · see citing works
“Experimental work has shown that individuals who are told that they will have to discuss their judgments publicly are more likely to process more information more objectively (Tetlock 1983, 1985).”
BackgroundFuller, J. B., Marler, L. E., & Hester, K. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.408 · Cited by 565 · see citing works
CSR and Assurance Services: A Research Agenda
Cohen, J. R., & Simnett, R. (2014) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-50876 · Cited by 511 · see citing works
“The authors also suggest using the theory of accountability (Tetlock 1983; Lerner and Tetlock 1999) to evaluate whether IAs will perform this task differently contingent upon whom they are primarily accountable to.”
Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C. (1987) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.003043 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Goodin, R. E. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547944.001.0001 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory.
Rottenstreich, Y., & Tversky, A. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.406 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
THE DELIBERATIVE CITIZEN: THEORY AND EVIDENCE
Mendelberg, T. (2009) · Cited by 423 · see citing works
Incorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value
Chapman, G. B., & Johnson, E. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.008 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information.
Ditto, P. H., Scepansky, J. A., Munro, G., Apanovitch, A., & Lockhart, L. K. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.53 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Accountability and judgment processes in a personality prediction task.
Tetlock, P. E., & Kim, J. I. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.52.4.700 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Self-citationOlson, B. J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. (2007) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206306298657 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Sloman, S. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.024 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search of the Mechanisms
Dubnick, M. J. (2014) · University of New Hampshire Scholars Repository (University of New Hampshire at Manchester) · doi:10.1080/15309576.2005.11051839 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
“For example, Lerner and Tetlock (1999); Tetlock (1983a, 1983b, 1985); Tetlock and Boettger (1989); Tetlock & Kim (1987); and Tetlock et al. (1989).”
BackgroundImagining Can Heighten or Lower the Perceived Likelihood of Contracting a Disease
Sherman, S. J., Cialdini, R. B., Schwartzman, D. F., & Reynolds, K. D. (1985) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167285111011 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Debiasing Audit Judgment with Accountability: A Framework and Experimental Results
Kennedy, J. J. (1993) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.2307/2491272 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
When less is more: Counterfactual thinking and satisfaction among Olympic medalists.
Medvec, V. H., Madey, S. F., & Gilovich, T. D. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.69.4.603 · Cited by 507 · see citing works
Support, Undermining, and Newcomer Socialization: Fitting in During the First 90 Days
Kammeyer‐Mueller, J. D., Wanberg, C. R., Rubenstein, A. L., & Song, Z. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0791 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
“There is a substantial literature on the importance of first impressions as a catalyst for forming attitudes toward other individuals through a process of confirmatory bias (e.g., Dougherty, Turban, & Callender , 1994; Tetlock, 1983).”
BackgroundGoal Effects on Action and Cognition
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1996) · KOPS (University of Konstanz) · Cited by 404 · see citing works
7. The Psychology of Group Conflict and the Dynamics of Oppression: A Social Dominance Perspective
Sidanius, J. (1993) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822396697-009 · Cited by 406 · see citing works
Satisficing in surveys: Initial evidence
Krosnick, J. A., Narayan, S., & Smith, W. R. (1996) · New Directions for Evaluation · doi:10.1002/ev.1033 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Automation Bias: Decision Making and Performance in High-Tech Cockpits
Mosier, K. L., Skitka, L. J., Heers, S., & Burdick, M. (1998) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0801_3 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
“Increasing accountability can successfully mitigate decision-making biases such as primacy effects (Tetlock, 1983), the”
BackgroundThe agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: Introducing the MAID model
van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., & de Liver, Y. N. (2009) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868308324518 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
“She reviewed the evidence for effortful processing in case of accuracy motivation (e.g., Kruglanski & Freund, 1983; Tetlock, 1983, 1985) and concluded that it is “impressive in its diversity”: “The work on accuracy-driven reasoning suggests that when people are motivated to be accurate, they expend…”
BackgroundWhy most people disapprove of me: experience sampling in impression formation.
Denrell, J. (2005) · Psychology Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.112.4.951 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
“For example, although accountability can reduce the effect of first impressions and expectations (Tetlock, 1983), it may not eliminate the bias produced by experience sampling.”
BackgroundNelson, M. W., & Tan, H. (2005) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/aud.2005.24.supplement.41 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Accountability and automation bias
SKITKA, L. J., MOSIER, K., & BURDICK, M. D. (2000) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1999.0349 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
“…as compared to non-accountable participants use more complex rules in choosing among response options (McAllister, Mitchell & Beach, 1979; Tetlock, 1983); show increased self-awareness of the determinants of their judgments (Cvetkovich, 1978; Hagafors & Brehmer, 1983); process persuasive…”
BackgroundAssessing uncertainty in physical constants
Henrion, M., & Fischhoff, B. (1986) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.14447 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Introduction – Heuristics and Biases: Then and Now
Gilovich, T. D., & Griffin, D. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.002 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
The influence of outcome desirability on optimism.
Križan, Z., & Windschitl, P. D. (2007) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.95 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
“…that a key outcome is a “high stakes” outcome would presumably have the same influence on judgment as would an enhanced accuracy motivation spurred by other sources, such as pressures for accountability to others (e.g., Tetlock, 1983) or a general “fear of invalidity” (Kruglanski & Freund, 1983).”
BackgroundThe Internet as Psychological Laboratory
Skitka, L. J., & Sargis, E. G. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190048 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
“Low levels of accountability are associated with stronger primacy effects in impression formation (Tetlock 1983), an increased tendency to make the fundamental attribution error (Tetlock 1985), A nn u.”
BackgroundPartisanship in a Social Setting
Klar, S. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12087 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Norm Theory: Comparing Reality to Its Alternatives
Kahneman, D. J., & Miller, D. T. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.022 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Freeman, D., Aquino, K. F., & McFerran, B. (2008) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167208325415 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Vance, A., Lowry, P. B., & Eggett, D. L. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.2.04 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
The effect of accountability on susceptibility to decision errors
Simonson, I., & Nye, P. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90020-8 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Plaks, J. E., Stroessner, S. J., Dweck, C. S., & Sherman, J. W. (2001) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.876 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
“In addition, heightened accuracy concerns induced, for example, by outcome dependency (Fiske & Neuberg, 1987), accountability (Tetlock, 1983), or anticipated interaction (e.”
BackgroundAccountability amplifies the status quo effect when change creates victims
Tetlock, P. E., & Boettger, R. (1994) · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making · doi:10.1002/bdm.3960070102 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Self-citation5. Symbolic Politics: A Socio-Psychological Theory
Sears, D. O. (1993) · Duke University Press eBooks · doi:10.1215/9780822396697-007 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Predecisional Distortion of Evidence as a Consequence of Real-Time Audit Review
Wilks, T. J. (2002) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2002.77.1.51 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Castilla, E. J. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0950 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Decision Dynamics in Two High Reliability Military Organizations
Roberts, K. H., Stout, S. K., & Halpern, J. J. (1994) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.40.5.614 · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Effects of justification and a mechanical aid on judgment performance
Ashton, R. H. (1992) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(92)90040-e · Cited by 245 · see citing works
Compatibility Effects in Judgment and Choice
Slovic, P., Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.014 · Cited by 233 · see citing works
Using Accountability to Reduce Access Policy Violations in Information Systems
Vance, A., Lowry, P. B., & Eggett, D. L. (2013) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.2753/mis0742-1222290410 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
“A notable exception is the work of tetlock and colleagues, who developed a theory of accountability to explain individual behavior in organizations [115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123]. consequently, we leverage tetlock’s research as the basis of our research model .”
MethodHochwarter, W. A., Ferris, G. R., Gavin, M. B., Perrewé, P. L., Hall, A. T., & Frink, D. D. (2006) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.09.003 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Changing Minds: Political Arguments and Political Persuasion
Cobb, M. D., & Kuklinski, J. H. (1997) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2111710 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Social judgeability: The impact of meta-informational cues on the use of stereotypes.
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Schadron, G., Leyens, J., & Rocher, S. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.48 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Accuracy motivation attenuates covert priming: The systematic reprocessing of social information.
Thompson, E. P., Roman, R. J., Moskowitz, G. B., Chaiken, S., & Bargh, J. A. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.3.474 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.007 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Judgmental extrapolation and the salience of change
Andreassen, P. B., & Kraus, S. J. (1990) · Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1002/for.3980090405 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
When Predictions Fail: The Dilemma of Unrealistic Optimism
Armor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.021 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1409 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
“This flexibility of thought reduces a number of different robust biases including primacy effects (Tetlock, 1983), the correspondence bias (Tetlock , 1985), and stereotyping (Neuberg & Fiske, 1987).”
BackgroundCondoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes.
Duguid, M. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. C. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037908 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Debiasing the Curse of Knowledge in Audit Judgment.
Kennedy, J. J. (1995) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/tar-9505096114 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
“In a series of experiments, Tetlock found accountability reduced primacy in an impression-formation task (Tetlock 1983), reduced over-attribution in an essay-attribution task (Tetlock 1985b), and reduced overconfidence in a personality-prediction task (Tetlock and Kim 1987).”
BackgroundCombatting gender discrimination: A lack of fit framework
Heilman, M. E., & Caleo, S. (2018) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430218761587 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“Thus, accountability not only inhibits the use of expectations in evaluations, but it also induces the use of more complex and systematic decision-making strategies (Lerner & Tetlock, 1999; Tetlock, 1983).”
BackgroundAccountability forces in performance appraisal
Klimoski, R. J., & Inks, L. W. (1990) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(90)90011-w · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L. J., & Boettger, R. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.57.4.632 · Cited by 610 · see citing works
Self-citationGender Stereotypes in the Workplace: Obstacles to Women's Career Progress
Heilman, M. E., & Parks‐Stamm, E. J. (2007) · Advances in group processes · doi:10.1016/s0882-6145(07)24003-2 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
How alike is it versus how likely is it: A disjunction fallacy in probability judgments.
Bar‐Hillel, M., & Neter, E. (1993) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.65.6.1119 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Sympathetic Magical Thinking: The Contagion and Similarity “Heuristics”
Rozin, P. N., & Nemeroff, C. J. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511808098.013 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
THE EFFECTS OF FEEDBACK ACCOUNTABILITY ON UPWARD APPRAISAL RATINGS
Antonioni, D. (1994) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1994.tb01728.x · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Krosnick, J. A., Li, F., & Lehman, D. R. (1990) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1140 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Accountability and ethics: reconsidering the relationships
Dubnick, M. J. (2003) · International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior · doi:10.1108/ijotb-06-03-2003-b002 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
“In a series of articles published in the 1980s, Teltock and his colleagues found that being told one must provide a justification for a decision had a significant influence on the individual’s approach to each decision (Tetlock, 1983a, 1983b, 1985; Tetlock & Kim, 1987).”
Preparatory power posing affects nonverbal presence and job interview performance.
Cuddy, A. J. C., Wilmuth, C. A., Yap, A. J., & Carney, D. R. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038543 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
“, Huffcutt, Conway, Roth, & Stone, 2001), such as “What makes you a good candidate for this job?” or, simply, “Why should we hire you?” This type of question typically occurs early in the interview, and this timing contributes to candidates’ responses disproportionately affecting interview outcomes via confirmation bi…”
BackgroundRater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework
Harris, M. M. (1994) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/0149-2063(94)90028-0 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
A Sober Second Thought: An Experiment in Persuading Russians to Tolerate
Gibson, J. L. (1998) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.2307/2991731 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Neuberg, S. L. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.56.3.374 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Trotman, A. J., & Trotman, K. T. (2013) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-50675 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tetlock, P. E.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tetlock, Philip E.
- ORCID
- Tetlock, Philip E.
- Venue
- Social Psychology Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 285
- ISSN
- 0190-2725 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2323541277
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 15.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Psychology Quarterly (publishedVersion)
- Aarhus University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Keywords
- accountability, first impressions, impression formation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
