A synthesis of non-fraud forensic accounting research
Abstract
We synthesize the academic literature and court rulings related to non-fraud forensic accounting topics to better understand the nature and extent of relevant works and to highlight areas where there is a need for future research. We concentrate on non-fraud forensic accounting issues relevant to academics and practitioners in several areas, including the forensic accountant as the expert witness, valuation, individual damages (sometimes referred to as forensic economics), and commercial damages: lost profits. We discuss prior research findings and court opinions related to the qualifications, work product, and communication skills required of forensic accountants to complete the work to a reasonable degree of scientific certainty. We close with a critical examination of how emerging technologies are likely to impact forensic accounting. JEL Classifications: G12; G14; G32; G34; G39.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Forensic accountants often underestimate their level of objectivity.
“According to DiGabriele (2020DiGabriele ( , 2011)), judges are particularly sensitive to bias, and forensic accountants often underestimate their level of objectivity.”
From Methodological Deficiencies in the Expert Testimony of Forensic Accountants: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Judicial Statements Pertaining to Daubert Exclusions (2021) · cites this paper as DiGabriele, 2020
Judges are particularly sensitive to bias.
“According to DiGabriele (2020DiGabriele ( , 2011)), judges are particularly sensitive to bias, and forensic accountants often underestimate their level of objectivity.”
From Methodological Deficiencies in the Expert Testimony of Forensic Accountants: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Judicial Statements Pertaining to Daubert Exclusions (2021) · cites this paper as DiGabriele, 2020
Cites
Financial Statement Fraud: Insights from the Academic Literature
Hogan, C. E., Rezaee, Z., Riley, R. A., & Velury, U. K. (2008) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/aud.2008.27.2.231 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Self-citationA Synthesis of Fraud-Related Research
Trompeter, G. M., Carpenter, T. D., Desai, N. K., Jones, K. L., & Riley, R. A. (2012) · Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory · doi:10.2308/ajpt-50360 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Self-citationInsights for Research and Practice: What We Learn about Fraud from Other Disciplines
Trompeter, G. M., Carpenter, T. D., Jones, K. L., & Riley, R. A. (2014) · Accounting Horizons · doi:10.2308/acch-50816 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Self-citationIs the Cost of Capital Different for Family Firms?
McConaughy, D. L. (1999) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00353.x · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Skoog, G. R., Ciecka, J. E., & Krueger, K. V. (2011) · Journal of Forensic Economics · doi:10.5085/0898-5510-22.2.165 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Understanding Business Valuation
Trugman, G. R. (2016) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119448662 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Hitchner, J. R. (2017) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119362814 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The Use of Forensic Accounting Experts in Tax Cases as Identified in Court OpinionsPreprint
Muehlmann, B. W., Burnaby, P. A., & Howe, M. A. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Effects of an Attorney's Line of Argument on Accountants' Expert Witness Testimony
Ricchiute, D. N. (2004) · The Accounting Review · doi:10.2308/accr.2004.79.1.221 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Dueling experts and imperfect verification
Yee, K. K. (2008) · International Review of Law and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.irle.2008.09.001 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Robustness of Judicial Decisions to Valuation‐Method Innovation: An Exploratory Empirical Study
Chen, F., Yee, K. K., & Yoo, Y. K. (2010) · Journal of Business Finance & Accounting · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02193.x · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Factors which may bias judges’ decisions to exclude accounting expert witnesses testimony
Domino, M. A., Stradiot, M., & Webinger, M. (2015) · Accounting Research Journal · doi:10.1108/arj-11-2014-0097 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Asset and Business Valuation in Estate Tax Cases: The Role of the Courts
Jackson, M., Pippin, S. E., & Wong, J. A. (2013) · Journal of the American Taxation Association · doi:10.2308/atax-50460 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Privately Held Company Valuation and Cost of Capital
Ramírez, A. A. R. (2014) · Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis · doi:10.1515/jbvela-2013-0017 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
The Butler Pinkerton Model for Company-Specific Risk Premium—A Critique
Kasper, L. J. (2008) · Business Valuation Review · doi:10.5791/0882-2875-27.4.233 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Quick, R. (2009) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Assessing Economics Damage in Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Litigation: The State of New York
Spizman, L. M., & Tinari, F. D. (2011) · Journal of Forensic Economics · doi:10.5085/jfe.22.1.75 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Public versus Private Market Participants and the Prices Paid for Private Companies
Covrig, V., & McConaughy, D. L. (2014) · Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis · doi:10.1515/jbvela-2014-0005 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
DiGabriele, J. A. (2006) · SSRN Electronic Journal · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Self-citationUnprofitable Lending: Modern Credit Regulation and the Lost Theory of Usury
McCall, B. M. (2008) · University of Oklahoma College of Law - Digital Commons (University of Oklahoma) · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Avoid Losing a <i>Daubert</i> Challenge: Some Best Practices for Expert Witnesses
Crumbley, D. L., & Cheng, C. C. (2014) · The ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research · doi:10.2308/jltr-50765 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Assessing Economic Damages in Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Litigation: The State of New Jersey
Tinari, F. D., & Kucsma, K. K. (2010) · Journal of Forensic Economics · doi:10.5085/jfe.21.2.219 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Assessing Economic Damages in Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Litigation: The State of Florida
Williams, D. R. (2002) · Journal of Forensic Economics · doi:10.5085/0898-5510-15.3.357 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Court Rulings in Estate Tax Cases: Is Gender a Factor?
Jackson, M., Pippin, S. E., & Wong, J. A. (2014) · The ATA Journal of Legal Tax Research · doi:10.2308/jltr-50914 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Schap, D. (n.d.) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Company-Specific Risk and Small Company Valuation
Cooper, L. A., DiGabriele, J. A., Riley, R. A., & Sorensen, T. L. (2021) · Journal of Forensic Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jfar-19-026 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationBrockardt, J. W. (2017) · Business Valuation Review · doi:10.5791/0882-2875-36.4.146 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Recoverable Damages for Wrongful Death in the States: A 2015 Review of Statutory Law
Schap, D., & Thompson, A. (2016) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Risk-Adjusted Damages Calculation in Breach of Contract Disputes: A Case Study
Graves, F. C., Bin, Z., Brosterman, M., & Murphy, Q. (2010) · Journal of Business Valuation and Economic Loss Analysis · doi:10.2202/1932-9156.1092 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Update to Assessing Economic Damages in Personal Injury andWrongful Death Litigation in Florida
Williams, D. R. (2016) · Journal of Forensic Economics · doi:10.5085/415.1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Assessing Economic Damages in Personal Injury and Wrongful Death Litigation: The State of Iowa
Rosenbaum, D. I., & Knoshaug, K. P. (2018) · Journal of Forensic Economics · doi:10.5085/jfe432.1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Lost Profits as Contract Damages: Problems of Proof and Limitations on Recovery
(1956) · The Yale Law Journal · doi:10.2307/794141 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Copyright Infringement’s Blurred Lines: Allocating Overhead in the Disgorgement of Profits
Keele, L. S. (2017) · BYU Law Library (Brigham Young University) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
3 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Forensic Accounting: A Novel Paradigm and Relevant Knowledge in Fraud Detection and Prevention
Afriyie, S. O., Akomeah, M. O., Amoakohene, G., Ampimah, B. C., Ocloo, C. E., & Kyei, M. O. (2023) · International Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/01900692.2021.2009855 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Developing learning objectives for forensic accounting using bloom’s taxonomy
Alshurafat, H., Alaqrabawi, M., & Shbail, M. O. A. (2023) · Accounting Education · doi:10.1080/09639284.2023.2222271 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Do Employees Waive Financial Red Flags through the Glassdoor?
Dunham, L. M., García, J., Grandstaff, J. L., & Wei, S. (2023) · Journal of Forensic Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jfar-2022-008 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Alshurafat, H., Ananzeh, H., Al‐Msiedeen, J. M., & Beattie, C. (2025) · Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development · doi:10.1108/jbsed-01-2025-0014 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Social Trust, Market Competition, and Tax Avoidance: Evidence from Contemporary China
Lam, B. M., Lui, G., & Shum, C. (2020) · Journal of Forensic Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jfar-19-010 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Company-Specific Risk and Small Company Valuation
Cooper, L. A., DiGabriele, J. A., Riley, R. A., & Sorensen, T. L. (2021) · Journal of Forensic Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jfar-19-026 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationAbukhalaf, R., Aldridge, M. M., & Smith, J. A. (2021) · Journal of Accounting, Finance and Auditing Studies · doi:10.32602/jafas.2021.016 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
“According to DiGabriele (2020, 2011), judges are particularly sensitive to bias, and forensic accountants often underestimate their level of objectivity.”
BackgroundIdentification and prevention of fraudulent financial reporting
Milojević, S., Knežević, S., & Šebek, V. (2024) · Tokovi osiguranja · doi:10.5937/tokosig2401146m · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Accounting Knowledge on Trial: Forensic Accountant Communication in Litigation
Donahoo, N. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4898021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Hasan, M. M. S., Latiff, A. R. A., & Abidin, Z. Z. (2024) · European Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.7176/ejbm/16-3-07 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Taxation and Forensic Accounting: Informing Research and Practice
DiGabriele, J. A., Antinozzi, H. S., Russo, C., & Kunz, P. (2023) · Journal of Forensic Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jfar-2023-021 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationWhich Purpose of Firm Valuation in Litigation? The HQ ExamplePreprint
Jennergren, L. P. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4569283 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Khan, M. Z. (2026) · Journal of Global Social Transformation · doi:10.71317/jgst.2.8(s).2026.430
Cost of Illiquidity: Marketability and Liquidity Discounts in a Margrabe Exchange Option Framework
Abbott, A. B. (2023) · Journal of Forensic Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jfar-2023-006
Bailey, W. A., Grandstaff, J. L., & Marcum, T. M. (2023) · Journal of Forensic Accounting Research · doi:10.2308/jfar-2022-027
Digital Transformation of Payment Systems: Fraud Issues and Detection Prospects
Иосифовна, А. Т. (2025) · Bulletin of Kemerovo State University Series Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.21603/2542-1840-2025-9-3-453-461
Lima, D. D. A. (2026) · Information systems engineering and management · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-16268-7_8
A comprehensive review of robotic process automation's impact and future directions
Hall, L. (2026) · Journal of Accounting Literature · doi:10.1108/jal-12-2024-0386
Awjan, K. (2026) · Horizons Intermediary Journal of Business Research · doi:10.67150/hijbr.v1i2.1
- Authors
- DiGabriele, J. A., Heitger, L. E., & Riley, R. (.
- Affiliations
- Montclair State University (US)
- Missouri State University (US)
- West Virginia University
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Accounting Research
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2020-08-04
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 257-277
- ISSN
- 2380-2138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3047007609
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 36
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 4.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Forensic Accounting Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting and Financial Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
- Keywords
- expert witness qualifications, valuation, forensic economics, lost profits, judicial decisions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review