The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Firm Performance Effects in Relation to the Implementation and Use of Enterprise Resource Planning Systems
Abstract
Research indicates that successful adoption of information technology to support business strategy can help organizations gain superior financial performance. The recent wave of enterprise-wide resource planning systems adoptions is a significant commitment of resources and may affect almost all business processes. This study examines the effect of adoption of enterprise systems on a firm's long-term financial performance. A large-scale data identification and collection method compared the financial data of 247 firms adopting enterprise wide systems with a matched control group of firms cross-sectionally and longitudinally before and after adoption. A number of implementation characteristics were also measured and their effects assessed. The results show that firms adopting enterprise systems exhibit higher differential performance only after two years of continued use. Furthermore, controlling for implementation characteristics as vendor choice, implementation goal, modules implemented, and implementation time period, helped explain the financial performance effects of enterprise resource planning system use. These results provide important insights that complement extant research findings and also raise future research issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3250983 · Cited by 5,042
The productivity paradox of information technology
Brynjolfsson, E. (1993) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/163298.163309 · Cited by 2,604
Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures
Hitt, L. M., Wu, D. J., & Zhou, X. (2002) · Journal of Management Information Systems · doi:10.1080/07421222.2002.11045716 · Cited by 877 · cited 1×
“Hunton et al. (2003) collected a sample of 63 ERP-adopting firms and examined the longitudinal impact of ERP adoption on firm performance.”
BackgroundEnterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution?
Soh, C., Kien, S. S., & Tay-Yap, J. (2000) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/332051.332070 · Cited by 686
The ERP Revolution: Surviving vs. Thriving
Ross, J. W., & Vitale, M. R. (2000) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1023/a:1026500224101 · Cited by 472
Cited by
Information Technology Impacts on Firm Performance: An Extension of Kohli and 1
Sabherwal, R., & Jeyaraj, A. (2015) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2015/39.4.4 · Cited by 200
The Business Value of IT: A Synthesis and Framework of Archival Research
Masli, A., Richardson, V. J., Sanchez, J. M., & Smith, R. E. (2011) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-10117 · Cited by 98
A Longitudinal Examination of Enterprise Resource Planning System Post-Implementation Enhancements
Cao, J., Nicolaou, A. I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2013) · Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.2308/isys-50398 · Cited by 29
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nicolaou, A. I.
- Venue
- Journal of Information Systems
- Publisher
- American Accounting Association
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 79-105
- ISSN
- 0888-7985 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-7959
- OpenAlex
- W2008719454
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.