Cited by 472ERP Systems Implementation and ImpactCorporate Governance and ManagementInformation Technology Governance and Strategy

The ERP Revolution: Surviving vs. Thriving

Ross, Jeanne W., Vitale, Michael R.·2000·Information Systems Frontiers

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1026500224101

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ross, J. W., & Vitale, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Information Systems Frontiers
Published
2000-08
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
233-241
ISSN
  • 1387-3326 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9419
OpenAlex
W1577288248
Cited by
472
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 31
FWCI
35.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Information Systems Frontiers (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Governance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Keywords
enterprise resource planning, ERP implementation, business value, success factors, implementation barriers, ERP adoption, IT investment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review